Re: [PATCH 4/6] pci: altera: Add Altera PCIe MSI driver
From: Marc Zyngier <hidden>
Date: 2015-07-28 17:58:49
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-pci, lkml
Hi Ley, On 28/07/15 11:45, Ley Foon Tan wrote:
This patch adds Altera PCIe MSI driver. This soft IP supports configurable number of vectors, which is a dts parameter.
Can't you read this configuration from the HW?
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Signed-off-by: Ley Foon Tan <redacted> --- drivers/pci/host/Kconfig | 7 + drivers/pci/host/Makefile | 1 + drivers/pci/host/pcie-altera-msi.c | 318 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 326 insertions(+) create mode 100644 drivers/pci/host/pcie-altera-msi.cdiff --git a/drivers/pci/host/Kconfig b/drivers/pci/host/Kconfig index af19039..a8b87fd 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/host/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/pci/host/Kconfig@@ -154,4 +154,11 @@ config PCIE_ALTERA Say Y here if you want to enable PCIe controller support for Altera SoCFPGA family of SoCs. +config PCIE_ALTERA_MSI + bool "Altera PCIe MSI feature" + depends on PCI_MSI && PCIE_ALTERA
What is the dependency with PCIE_ALTERA? Isn't that module standalone?
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+ help + Say Y here if you want PCIe MSI support for the Altera SocFPGA SoC. + This MSI driver supports Altera MSI to GIC controller IP. + endmenudiff --git a/drivers/pci/host/Makefile b/drivers/pci/host/Makefile index 6954f76..6c4913d 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/host/Makefile +++ b/drivers/pci/host/Makefile@@ -18,3 +18,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_IPROC) += pcie-iproc.o obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_IPROC_PLATFORM) += pcie-iproc-platform.o obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_IPROC_BCMA) += pcie-iproc-bcma.o obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_ALTERA) += pcie-altera.o +obj-$(CONFIG_PCIE_ALTERA_MSI) += pcie-altera-msi.odiff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-altera-msi.c b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-altera-msi.c new file mode 100644 index 0000000..b852b51 --- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-altera-msi.c@@ -0,0 +1,318 @@ +/* + * Copyright Altera Corporation (C) 2013-2015. All rights reserved + * + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it + * under the terms and conditions of the GNU General Public License, + * version 2, as published by the Free Software Foundation. + * + * This program is distributed in the hope it will be useful, but WITHOUT + * ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or + * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License for + * more details. + * + * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along with + * this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. + */ +#include <linux/interrupt.h> +#include <linux/module.h> +#include <linux/msi.h> +#include <linux/of_address.h> +#include <linux/of_irq.h> +#include <linux/of_pci.h> +#include <linux/pci.h> +#include <linux/platform_device.h> +#include <linux/slab.h> + +#define MSI_STATUS 0x0 +#define MSI_ERROR 0x4 +#define MSI_INTMASK 0x8 + +#define MAX_MSI_VECTORS 32 +struct altera_msi { + DECLARE_BITMAP(used, MAX_MSI_VECTORS); + struct mutex lock; /* proctect used variable */ + struct platform_device *pdev; + struct irq_domain *msi_domain; + void __iomem *csr_base; + void __iomem *vector_base; + u32 vector_phy;
This should be a phys_addr_t. Not everything is 32bit.
+ u32 num_of_vectors;
+ int irq;
+};
+
+static inline void msi_writel(struct altera_msi *msi, u32 value, u32 reg)
+{
+ writel(value, msi->csr_base + reg);You should be able to use the relaxed accessors.
+}
+
+static inline u32 msi_readl(struct altera_msi *msi, u32 reg)
+{
+ return readl(msi->csr_base + reg);Same here.
+}
+
+static irqreturn_t altera_msi_isr(int irq, void *data)
+{
+ struct altera_msi *msi = data;
+ unsigned long status;
+ u32 num_of_vectors = msi->num_of_vectors;
+ u32 processed = 0;
+ u32 offset;
+
+ do {
+ status = msi_readl(msi, MSI_STATUS);
+ if (!status)
+ break;
+
+ do {
+ offset = find_first_bit(&status, num_of_vectors);
+ /* Dummy read from vector to clear the interrupt */
+ readl(msi->vector_base + (offset * sizeof(u32)));readl_relaxed
+ + irq = irq_find_mapping(msi->msi_domain->parent, offset);
This would tend to indicate that you don't really need to store the msi_domain pointer, but the inner_domain pointer instead.
+ if (irq) {
+ if (test_bit(offset, msi->used))
+ generic_handle_irq(irq);
+ else
+ dev_info(&msi->pdev->dev, "unhandled MSI\n");
+ } else
+ dev_info(&msi->pdev->dev, "unexpected MSI\n");
+
+ /* Clear the bit from status and repeat without reading
+ * again status register. */
+ clear_bit(offset, &status);
+ processed++;
+ } while (status);
+ } while (1);
+
+ return processed > 0 ? IRQ_HANDLED : IRQ_NONE;This shouldn't be a simple interrupt interrupt handler, but instead a chained irqchip. See pci-xgene-msi.c for an example of such a thing.
+}
+
+static struct irq_chip altera_msi_irq_chip = {
+ .name = "Altera PCIe MSI",
+ .irq_enable = pci_msi_unmask_irq,
+ .irq_disable = pci_msi_mask_irq,
+ .irq_mask = pci_msi_mask_irq,
+ .irq_unmask = pci_msi_unmask_irq,
+};
+
+static struct msi_domain_info altera_msi_domain_info = {
+ .flags = (MSI_FLAG_USE_DEF_DOM_OPS | MSI_FLAG_USE_DEF_CHIP_OPS),So you don't support MSIX? That's a bit weird.
+ .chip = &altera_msi_irq_chip,
+};
+
+static void altera_compose_msi_msg(struct irq_data *data, struct msi_msg *msg)
+{
+ struct altera_msi *msi = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(data);
+ u32 mask;
+
+ msg->address_lo = msi->vector_phy + (data->hwirq * sizeof(u32));Each MSI has a separate doorbell? Interesting... Please use lower_32_bits on the above expression.
+ /* 32 bit address only */ + msg->address_hi = 0;
So this HW will never be used in a 64bit platform? Oddly enough, I cannot believe it. Please use upper_32_bits() as the complement of the above. At least, we'll be future proof.
+ msg->data = data->hwirq;
+
+ mask = msi_readl(msi, MSI_INTMASK);
+ mask |= 1 << data->hwirq;
+ msi_writel(msi, mask, MSI_INTMASK);
+ dev_dbg(&msi->pdev->dev, "msi#%d address_lo 0x%x\n", (int)data->hwirq,
+ msg->address_lo);
+}
+
+static int altera_msi_set_affinity(struct irq_data *irq_data,
+ const struct cpumask *mask, bool force)
+{
+ return irq_set_affinity(irq_data->hwirq, mask);There is no way this can be right. irq_data->hwirq can *never* be passed as a Linux IRQ. This really should be the IRQ to the GIC. Which raises another issue: as you only have a single interrupt to the GIC, changing the affinity of a single MSI is going to affect all the other MSIs as well. This doesn't seem like a desirable behaviour.
+}
+
+static struct irq_chip altera_msi_bottom_irq_chip = {
+ .name = "Altera MSI",
+ .irq_compose_msi_msg = altera_compose_msi_msg,
+ .irq_set_affinity = altera_msi_set_affinity,
+};
+
+static int altera_irq_domain_alloc(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int virq,
+ unsigned int nr_irqs, void *args)
+{
+ struct altera_msi *msi = domain->host_data;
+ int bit;
+
+ mutex_lock(&msi->lock);
+
+ bit = find_first_zero_bit(msi->used, msi->num_of_vectors);
+ if (bit < msi->num_of_vectors)
+ set_bit(bit, msi->used);
+ else
+ bit = -ENOSPC;You can loose the "else" clause...
+ + mutex_unlock(&msi->lock); + + if (bit < 0) + return bit;
... and test for bit >= msi->num_of_vectors, returning -ENOSPC if out of vectors.
+
+ irq_domain_set_info(domain, virq, bit, &altera_msi_bottom_irq_chip,
+ domain->host_data, handle_simple_irq,
+ NULL, NULL);
+ set_irq_flags(virq, IRQF_VALID);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void altera_irq_domain_free(struct irq_domain *domain,
+ unsigned int virq, unsigned int nr_irqs)
+{
+ struct irq_data *d = irq_domain_get_irq_data(domain, virq);
+ struct altera_msi *msi = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
+ u32 mask;
+
+ mutex_lock(&msi->lock);
+
+ if (!test_bit(d->hwirq, msi->used))
+ dev_err(&msi->pdev->dev, "trying to free unused MSI#%lu\n",
+ d->hwirq);
+ else {
+ clear_bit(d->hwirq, msi->used);
+ mask = msi_readl(msi, MSI_INTMASK);
+ mask &= ~(1 << d->hwirq);
+ msi_writel(msi, mask, MSI_INTMASK);
+ }
+
+ mutex_unlock(&msi->lock);
+}
+
+static const struct irq_domain_ops msi_domain_ops = {
+ .alloc = altera_irq_domain_alloc,
+ .free = altera_irq_domain_free,
+};
+
+static int altera_allocate_domains(struct altera_msi *msi)
+{
+ struct irq_domain *inner_domain;
+
+ inner_domain = irq_domain_add_linear(NULL, msi->num_of_vectors,
+ &msi_domain_ops, msi);
+ if (!inner_domain) {
+ dev_err(&msi->pdev->dev, "failed to create IRQ domain\n");
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ }
+
+ msi->msi_domain = pci_msi_create_irq_domain(
+ msi->pdev->dev.of_node,
+ &altera_msi_domain_info, inner_domain);
+ if (!msi->msi_domain) {
+ dev_err(&msi->pdev->dev, "failed to create MSI domain\n");
+ irq_domain_remove(inner_domain);
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void altera_free_domains(struct altera_msi *msi)
+{
+ struct irq_domain *inner_domain = msi->msi_domain->parent;
+
+ irq_domain_remove(msi->msi_domain);
+ irq_domain_remove(inner_domain);
+}
+
+int altera_msi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+ struct altera_msi *msi;
+ struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
+ struct resource *res;
+ int ret;
+
+ msi = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(struct altera_msi),
+ GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!msi)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ mutex_init(&msi->lock);
+ msi->pdev = pdev;
+
+ res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "csr");
+ msi->csr_base = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res);
+ if (IS_ERR(msi->csr_base)) {
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev, "get csr resource failed\n");
+ return -EADDRNOTAVAIL;You're being quite creative when it comes to error codes. I'd expect this to be used for networking (pci-tegra also uses it, which is even more disturbing). I'd be more confident with an -ENOMEM.
+ }
+
+ res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM,
+ "vector_slave");
+ msi->vector_base = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res);
+ if (IS_ERR(msi->vector_base)) {
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev, "get vector slave resource failed\n");
+ return -EADDRNOTAVAIL;
+ }
+
+ msi->vector_phy = res->start;
+
+ if (of_property_read_u32(np, "num-vectors", &msi->num_of_vectors)) {
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to parse the number of vectors\n");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }Since this is a configurable IP, you should have a register telling you the number of configured MSI, shouldn't you? Or is the HW really, really dumb?
+
+ ret = altera_allocate_domains(msi);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ msi->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
+ if (msi->irq <= 0) {
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to map IRQ: %d\n", msi->irq);
+ ret = -ENODEV;
+ goto err;
+ }
+
+ ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, msi->irq, altera_msi_isr, 0,
+ altera_msi_irq_chip.name, msi);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to request IRQ: %d\n", ret);
+ goto err;
+ }Turn this into a call to irq_set_chained_handler.
+ + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, msi); + + return 0; + +err: + irq_domain_remove(msi->msi_domain);
You're leaking the inner domain here.
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static int altera_msi_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+ struct altera_msi *msi = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
+
+ msi_writel(msi, 0, MSI_INTMASK);
+
+ altera_free_domains(msi);
+
+ platform_set_drvdata(pdev, NULL);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static const struct of_device_id altera_msi_of_match[] = {
+ { .compatible = "altr,msi-1.0", NULL },
+ { },
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, altera_msi_of_match);
+
+static struct platform_driver altera_msi_driver = {
+ .driver = {
+ .name = "altera-msi",
+ .owner = THIS_MODULE,
+ .of_match_table = altera_msi_of_match,
+ },
+ .probe = altera_msi_probe,
+ .remove = altera_msi_remove,
+};
+
+static int __init altera_msi_init(void)
+{
+ return platform_driver_register(&altera_msi_driver);
+}
+
+subsys_initcall(altera_msi_init);
+
+MODULE_AUTHOR("Ley Foon Tan [off-list ref]");
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Altera PCIe MSI support");
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");Thanks, M. -- Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...