On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 08:29:18AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
On Fri, 24 Jul 2015, Mark Brown wrote:
quoted
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 11:24:34AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
From here:
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
+ pm8941-regulators {
+ compatible = "qcom,rpm-pm8941-regulators";
+ vdd_l13_l20_l23_l24-supply = <&pm8941_boost>;
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
I'd like Mark to glance at this.
Mark: Is this new property okay?
As far as I can see that looks like a standard supply property, assuming
the supply is actually called that why would it be an issue?
quoted
The specified range of the regulator is 1.75-1.85V and this is handled
by the implementation, however the board designers have stated that it
is only allowed to be configured to 1.8V.
quoted
So DT is used to narrow the capabilities of the individual component to
something that's suitable for this particular system.
quoted
quoted
We still need Mark to look at this.
Is it okay for the regulator-{min,max}-microvolt to be artificially
restricted to the required value, despite knowing that the regulator
is capable of supply {more,less} voltage?
Yes, that's the entire purpose of those properties - to set the limits
the board designers have which will typically be more restrictive than
those that the regulator itself is capable of imposing.