Thread (18 messages) 18 messages, 4 authors, 2015-07-09

Re: [PATCH v4 3/5] tee: generic TEE subsystem

From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: 2015-07-08 23:53:30
Also in: linux-arm-kernel, lkml

On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 05:16:12PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 03:33:25PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
quoted
quoted
The basic issue is that cdev_del doesn't seem to be synchronizing.

The use after free race is then something like:

   struct tpm_chip {
 	struct device dev;
	struct cdev cdev;
Oops, right there's your problem.  You can't have two reference counted
objects trying to manage the memory of a single structure.  No matter
what you do, it's going to be a pain to deal with this, so don't :)
Sure, generally, yes, but that isn't done for no reason, it is to make
open straightforward:

static int tpm_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
{
	struct tpm_chip *chip =
		container_of(inode->i_cdev, struct tpm_chip, cdev);

We need to recover the tpm_chip associated with the char device
node, in a way that is holding a kref on it, without racing with
cdev_del/etc

This scheme does mean that if we have a struct file we have a kref on
the cdev, and if we have cdev then we have a kref on the tpm_chip,
which is really easy to use properly.
quoted
quoted
Ie we need cdev to hold a ref on tpm_chip->dev until cdev_put is
called.
No, separate them, make the cdev a pointer and all should be fine.
Okay, cdev_alloc takes care of the cdev lifetime.

Do you have a simple solution to replace container_of as well?

What would you think about something like:

 cdev_alloc(&chip->dev.kref)
Just pick either the cdev to handle the lifetime rules, or the struct
device, you'll still need a container_of().  Just don't do both as odds
are the lifetime rules is going to get really hard to debug and ensure
that everything is correct on the shutdown/release path.

thanks,

greg k-h
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help