Thread (16 messages) 16 messages, 4 authors, 2015-06-20

Re: [PATCH V7 2/3] OPP: Allow multiple OPP tables to be passed via DT

From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Date: 2015-06-20 02:18:41
Also in: linux-arm-kernel, linux-pm

On 19-06-15, 11:44, Stephen Boyd wrote:
On 06/18, Viresh Kumar wrote:
quoted
The problem you stated now was there with the current state of
bindings. The name is embedded into the OPP table node and so is fixed
for all the CPUs. Moving it to the CPU node will give all CPUs a
chance to name it whatever they want to. And the same list has to be
replicated to all CPUs sharing the clock rails.
Yes I don't see how the name will be different for any CPU, hence
my complaint/question about duplicate names in each CPU. I guess
it isn't any worse than clock-names though so I'm fine with it.
So what I wrote about the string being same for all CPUs, is valid
only to CPUs sharing clock line and hence OPPs. If there are CPUs with
independent lines, like in Krait, then the CPUs are free to choose
whatever name they want for the OPP tables, even if they are sharing
the same tables.

-- 
viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pm" in
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help