On 19 June 2015 at 00:45, Michael Turquette [off-list ref] wrote:

Quoting Joachim Eastwood (2015-06-10 07:02:59)

quoted

Hi Mike,

quoted

Hi Joachim,

If it were me, I would have broken this up into two tables, one for each
CCU. In general I would structure the code to reflect the fact that two
different IP blocks are being accessed. This isn't a deal breaker but I
thought I would mention it in case you want to make the change.

Otherwise this series looks good to me. Let me know if you plan a V5
submission.

If there is still time for 4.2 and you don't have any more comments on
how the driver uses the DT bindings I would rather send a follow up
patch that splits the ccu table for 4.3.

quoted

I can take patches #1-4 into the clk tree. Please add my Acked-by to
patch #5. I will create an immutable branch to share with the arm-soc
tree so that they can take #5 and have access to the dt-bindings
headers.

Sounds good. I'll talk to arm-soc team about it. But it isn't critical
for me to get the DTS changes in for 4.2, but I would be very grateful
for getting the drivers and headers in for 4.2 so that 4.3 is ready
and doesn't have any header dependencies for all the driver DTS stuff.

Patches #1-4 applied to clk-next for 4.2.

Thanks a lot, Mike.


regards,
Joachim Eastwood
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html