Hi Aisheng,
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 7:46 PM, Suman Tripathi [off-list ref] wrote:
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 6:06 PM, Ulf Hansson [off-list ref]
wrote:
quoted
On 21 May 2015 at 10:43, Suman Tripathi [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
The sdhci framework disables SDR104/SDR50/DDR50 based on only quirk.
This patch adds the support to disable SDR104/SDR50/DDR50 based on
reading the capability register 0.
Signed-off-by: Suman Tripathi <redacted>
---
---
drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
index 58c1770..a3d9b8a 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c
@@ -3118,7 +3118,8 @@ int sdhci_add_host(struct sdhci_host *host)
}
}
- if (host->quirks2 & SDHCI_QUIRK2_NO_1_8_V)
+ if (host->quirks2 & SDHCI_QUIRK2_NO_1_8_V ||
+ !(caps[0] & SDHCI_CAN_VDD_180))
caps[1] &= ~(SDHCI_SUPPORT_SDR104 | SDHCI_SUPPORT_SDR50
|
quoted
SDHCI_SUPPORT_DDR50);
--
1.8.2.1
I have no problem with this patch, except that it would be nice to get
a few "tested by" to make sure it doesn't break UHS support for some
SoCs.
Kind regards
Uffe
Can anyone test this in some other SoC ? Appreciate your help ..
Can you test this patch on imx SoC ?
--
Thanks,
with regards,
Suman Tripathi
--
Thanks,
with regards,
Suman Tripathi