On Mon 2015-05-25 02:14:28, Rob Landley wrote:

On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 2:27 PM, Yann Droneaud [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

I've added licensing-VjfpZJbb0kk@public.gmane.org in Cc: in my previous message to have an
advice on this subject, but I failed to notice licensing-dGWS0fDw8IM@public.gmane.org
is not a mailing list: I was assigned request ID [gnu.org #1017262].

Regards.

They're also not an unbiased source. Their job is to reply "you should
license it under GPLv3" without actually looking at your message.
(This is a slight oversimplification, they may instead recomend the
GFDL. They will never _not_ recommend one of their licenses.)

Actually, I got FSF to change license on piece of code from GPLv2 to LGPLv2
before. They are not completely evil :-).

Personally, I'm sad we're starting to get ACPI for arm but if device
tree data files are only available under GPL, people will hold their
nose and deploy ACPI.

									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in