Re: [PATCH V5 1/3] OPP: Redefine bindings to overcome shortcomings

[PATCH V5 0/3] OPP: Introduce OPP (V2) bindings · Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> · 2015-05-20
[PATCH V5 1/3] OPP: Redefine bindings to overcome shortcomings · Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> · 2015-05-20
Re: [PATCH V5 1/3] OPP: Redefine bindings to overcome shortcomings · Rob Herring <hidden> · 2015-05-20
Re: [PATCH V5 1/3] OPP: Redefine bindings to overcome shortcomings · Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> · 2015-05-21
Re: [PATCH V5 1/3] OPP: Redefine bindings to overcome shortcomings · Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> · 2015-05-21
Re: [PATCH V5 1/3] OPP: Redefine bindings to overcome shortcomings · Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> · 2015-05-21
Re: [PATCH V5 1/3] OPP: Redefine bindings to overcome shortcomings · Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> · 2015-05-21
Re: [PATCH V5 1/3] OPP: Redefine bindings to overcome shortcomings · Rob Herring <hidden> · 2015-05-22
Re: [PATCH V5 1/3] OPP: Redefine bindings to overcome shortcomings · Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> · 2015-05-26
[PATCH V5 2/3] OPP: Allow multiple OPP tables to be passed via DT · Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> · 2015-05-20
Re: [PATCH V5 2/3] OPP: Allow multiple OPP tables to be passed via DT · Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> · 2015-05-21
Re: [PATCH V5 2/3] OPP: Allow multiple OPP tables to be passed via DT · Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> · 2015-05-21
Re: [PATCH V5 2/3] OPP: Allow multiple OPP tables to be passed via DT · Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> · 2015-05-26
[PATCH V5 3/3] OPP: Add binding for 'opp-suspend' · Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> · 2015-05-20
Re: [PATCH V5 3/3] OPP: Add binding for 'opp-suspend' · Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> · 2015-05-21
Re: [PATCH V5 3/3] OPP: Add binding for 'opp-suspend' · Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> · 2015-05-21
Re: [PATCH V5 3/3] OPP: Add binding for 'opp-suspend' · Nishanth Menon <hidden> · 2015-05-21

From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Date: 2015-05-21 06:06:00
Also in: linux-arm-kernel, linux-pm

On 21-05-15, 00:58, Nishanth Menon wrote:

I assume you meant [1] which in turn pointed to [2]. Thanks, will do so.

Right.

-- 
viresh

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help