On 23/03/15 16:59, Lee Jones wrote:

On Mon, 23 Mar 2015, Pavel Machek wrote:

quoted

quoted

On Mon 2015-03-23 15:02:13, Lee Jones wrote:

quoted

quoted

On Mon, 23 Mar 2015, Pavel Machek wrote:

quoted

quoted

On Mon 2015-03-23 12:07:43, Lee Jones wrote:

quoted

quoted

This patch requires a DT Ack.

No, it requires DT people to be notified -- and they were, few times
by now.

They clearly don't care.

Well fortunately for the Kernel community, I do care.  And as this
patch adds 3 new DT properties, has been through many iterations
already with vast changes made over that period and there is still
some controversy looming, I'm saying that it _does_ require a DT
Ack.

Can you help get that ack, then? As a maintainer, you have better
chance getting reply from DT people than patch submitter.

Hopefully they will see my plea a couple of replies back.

If that fails I'll go poke them via other means.  Failing that I'll go
see them in person and continually hit them with wet fish until one of
them relents.

Nice, as we can see it doesn't take _that_ much to be a really good
subsystem maintainer. I wish you good luck and hope there will be no
need to realize the very last steps of that clever plan.

-- 
Regards,
Sylwester