Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] devicetree: bindings: Document qcom,msm-id and qcom,board-id
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Date: 2015-03-10 19:52:09
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-arm-msm, lkml
On Tuesday 10 March 2015 13:10:08 Kumar Gala wrote:
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
The top level qcom,msm-id and qcom,board-id are utilized by bootloadersquoted
on Qualcomm MSM platforms to determine which device tree should be utilized and passed to the kernel. Cc: <redacted> Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <redacted>Is this the special magic that allows qcom bootloaders to take a kernel plus multiple DTBs and figure out which DTB to pass? KevinyesThat's a bummer. Luckily, the solution for upstream is still quite simple: Provide only one devicetree, and it'll be used, right?We can provide only one, we still need the IDs in the DT.How are the DTS provided? Concatenated with the kernel, or in a wrapped data format? Or in a separate partition from the kernel?Its a wrapped data format that is than concatenated with the kernel if I remember correctly.Then you should be able to create a tool that can write this concatenated format and insert these properties from a table that matches the boot loader, right? ArndAre you suggesting the tool insert the properties in the DT? I’m not sure I understand what the point of doing that would be.To insert platform-local properties that mean nothing outside of the firmware packaging of the device trees, which is the case here? I think the idea of having the installer script inserting them is quite reasonable in this case. -OlofThese values are static, so not sure what the point of having the installer script do that?
It combines two hacks to work around a nonstandard boot loader. Once the bootloader is fixed, you can stop using that script. Arnd