On Mon, 2015-03-02 at 19:09 +0000, Arun Ramamurthy wrote:

quoted

The existing bindings intentionally avoided quoting internal registers -
they are supposed to describe how the hardware is wired up...

So how about something like "arm,pl11x,tft-invert-clac"? Then the driver
sets the bit or not, depending on the property existance?

Sure, I can change it to two properties called arm,pl11x,tft-invert-clac 
and arm,pl11x,tft-clksel. Would that be acceptable?

That would be fine by me :-)

Pawel