Re: [PATCH v5 2/7] mailbox: arm_mhu: add driver for ARM MHU controller

On Feb 5, 2015 5:13 PM, "Arnd Bergmann" [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

I know typedef's are frowned upon, but how bad is the following option?
       typedef void*  mbox_data_info
       int mbox_send_message(struct mbox_chan *chan, mbox_data_info

data);

I don't see how that would help.

If it's abuse because the argument is a void*... What if we called it
mbox_data_info?  To say platforms are free to pass data as a pointer or a
value :)

Jassi