Re: [PATCH 0/8] Add proper support for Compulab CM-A510/SBC-A510
From: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>
Date: 2015-02-26 20:35:45
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-i2c, lkml
On 26.02.2015 21:01, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 02/26/2015 12:39 PM, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:quoted
On 26.02.2015 18:55, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:quoted
On 17/02/2015 19:52, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:quoted
This patch set improves current mainline support for the Compulab CM-A510 System-on-Module (SoM) and its default Compulab SBC-A510 base board. Thanks to Gabriel Dobato who agreed to remote debug and test the provided DT changes.[...]quoted
quoted
Sebastian Hesselbarth (8): i2c: mux-pinctrl: Rework to honor disabled child nodes devicetree: vendor-prefixes: Add CompuLab to known vendors ARM: dts: dove: Fix uart[23] reg property ARM: dts: dove: Always include gpio and interrupt-controller headers ARM: dts: dove: Add node labels for PCIe ports 0 and 1 ARM: dts: dove: Add some more common pinctrl settings ARM: dts: dove: Add internal i2c multiplexer node ARM: dts: dove: Add proper support for Compulab CM-A510/SBC-A510Patches 3 to 6 applied on mvebu/dt If I understood well patches 7 and 8 depend on patch 1 which had not been taken yet.Correct. Once I get a Tested-by from Stephen, I'll resend the 4 remaining patches.Me? For which patch? I thought there was going to be a v2 of the i2c mux driver patch given the comments on it, but perhaps I'm misremembering?
AFAIKS, your concerns were addressed to the wording of the binding doc changes. You don't need that ones to be taken care of before you can give the i2c-mux-pinctrl driver a functional test, do you? ;) FWIW, it would be great if you can give patch 1 a test run on one of the tegra boards using i2c-mux-pinctrl. I'll address the wording comments if there is no issues with the driver changes. Sebastian