Re: [PATCH RFC] pinctrl: at91

On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 11:12:45AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:

On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 4:03 PM, Ludovic Desroches
[off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

From my point of view, it is two distinct topics. One is a very
important fix because our SAMA5D4 device is not booting without it. The
other one is a proper way to manage gpio ranges but alone I don't think
it can solve my issue.

Can you make me a minimal, sane patch that fixes the boot regression?

I hate regressions so these need to be fixed first...

The rest we can discuss I guess.

Or is it not possible to solve the boot regression without the larger
fix?

No I don't think we can have a smaller patch than this one to fix it.
Next step is to decide if we go further as you suggested, knowing that we
would have to modify the device tree. Moreover we will have to rework
our pinctrl driver (or write a new one) since we will have new pio
controller on future devices.

Regards

Ludovic
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html