Re: [PATCH 4/9] pci: add DT based ARM Versatile PCI host driver
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Date: 2015-01-05 09:35:32
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-pci
On Friday 02 January 2015 17:13:19 Rob Herring wrote:
On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 2:52 PM, Arnd Bergmann [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Friday 02 January 2015 12:14:43 Rob Herring wrote:quoted
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 3:58 PM, Arnd Bergmann [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Tuesday 30 December 2014 13:28:33 Rob Herring wrote:
quoted
quoted
quoted
Maybe just return PCIBIOS_BAD_REGISTER_NUMBER in this case?Perhaps. We could probably simplify the config space read/write functions and just provide the PCI core a bus/devfn/offset to config address translation function. That would not work in all cases, but propably most that have memory mapped config space.Actually, thinking about this some more, the implementation seems to be "CAM" compliant, and we could share the confic space accessors with the ones from drivers/pci/host/pci-host-generic.c.Almost. It uses readl for all size accesses. Yet writes support different access sizes. I would guess that the h/w can support byte and word reads if writes are supported, but I can't really verify. Dword-only sized reads or reads and writes seem to be the main variations for config space accesses. There's a few hosts with more complex config space access setup, but quite a few only vary in address decode.
It was probably just done the current way because it seemed simpler at the time, but I agree that we can just keep it like this if there is any chance it's required as a workaround for a hardware glitch. With your other patch you just posted, it really becomes trivial to do.
quoted
quoted
I'm a bit puzzled myself. I think that the devices are not probed until after pci_assign_unassigned_bus_resources. It certainly doesn't work without that call. Really, I think of_irq_parse_and_map_pci should be the default if no one else has set the device's irq (and the host has a device node of course). It also seems to be a bit of random set of pci functions that are called here. It would be nice to simplify this chunk of code.Yes, and we recently had some attempts at creating a better interface posted on the mailing list, not sure what the latest status on it is. I think we want to end up with a two-stage interface along the lines of: /* allocate a pci_host_bridge, scan DT, set default operations, map I/O space if necessary, request all resources ... */ phb = pci_host_bridge_create(parent, ..., sizeof(struct my_pci_private));Humm, I wondered what happened to pci_host_bridge_create and thought we had abandoned it. It wasn't too clear reading thru the threads. The host drivers generally still have to walk thru the resources anyway to setup inbound and outbound windows, so we don't gain too much moving that out.
I think the discussion has not ended yet, I'm still in favor of doing it like that. The current of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources() function is indeed lacking a bit because it just returns the resources that are needed for setting up the PCI side, but it doesn't provide a list of the host side windows that may need to get programmed into hardware registers on machines without a firmware that has set them up in advance (i.e. most ARM32 and MIPS32 machines). We could add another exported function to return those, or we could find a way to pass those back through the pci_host_bridge pointer from the common function. Setting up the PCI side by itself does seem useful to me though, mainly to prevent host controller drivers from getting it wrong.
And the error clean-up gets complicated too.
In what way? I would hope that we could come up with a way to make pci_host_bridge_create() able to roll-back, so it does nothing in case of an error, and allocate all resources using devm_* so it all gets undone if probe() fails for another reason. Arnd