Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2014-11-26

Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] dt-bindings: simplefb-sunxi: Add sunxi simplefb extensions

From: Tomi Valkeinen <hidden>
Date: 2014-11-26 08:13:39
Also in: linux-arm-kernel, linux-fbdev

Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)

On 25/11/14 15:45, Hans de Goede wrote:
quoted
Wouldn't

compatible = "allwinner,sun4i-simple-framebuffer", "simple-framebuffer";

tell that it's a simple-framebuffer, with allwinner's sun4i extensions?

I guess you can have just "allwinner,simple-framebuffer", and then if a
new Allwinner SoC has a totally different display controller, the
documentation would specify that this property is for that SoC, and this
another property is for that another SoC. But isn't the compatible
string what's supposed to use in cases like this?
The only soc specific thing in the binding is the pipeline property string
values, and we can always add new values to that, the rest is all generic,
as simplefb is generic.
The thing I don't understand is that the compatible string states that
"this covers all Allwinner SoCs", even if we have no idea what kind of
SoCs those may be. And if it covers all kinds of SoCs, then it might as
well be fully generic, not Allwinner specific.

And if it's not fully generic, then having it cover all possible
Allwinner SoCs doesn't make sense either.
As said Ian Campbell, Grant and me have decided on using this, and
currently
patches are already queued up for both the dts files and u-boot to use
this,
so unless there are really strong reasons to change it at this point I
would
prefer to keep this as is.
Ok. Well, as I said, it does not look correct to me, but if everybody
else agrees on it (and I see I didn't get any replies during the night),
I'll be applying this today.

 Tomi
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help