On Saturday 22 November 2014 06:18 AM, Kukjin Kim wrote:

Wolfram Sang wrote:

quoted

Hi Wolfram,

quoted

quoted

quoted

I usually don't take DTS patches. They should go via arm-soc. Please say
so if there are reasons I should take them.

I CC'ed to you because same patch contains changes in i2c driver.

Yes, those should absolutely go via my I2C tree. You need to make a
seperate patch out of the dts changes which then also should go via
samsung-soc, unless Kukjin says he really wants to go the via I2C. But I
guess the latter will just create merge conflicts.

Hmm...I think, Pankaj needs to submit separated patches 1) driver change, 2) dt
change and then 3) remove change. And 2nd and 3rd changes should be handed in
Samsung tree together after landing 1) change in -next.

Of course, 1) change should be handled in i2c tree ;)

Thanks for review and guidance. I separated i2c driver changes and 
posted it as v6 here [1]. DT changes and mach-exynos removal of i2c 
settings have been posted as v6 here [2]. Please do review and if OK 
let's get it merged.

[1]: i2c-driver: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/5363981/
[2]: mach-exynos: 
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.samsung-soc/40155

Thanks,
Pankaj Dubey

Thanks,
Kukjin