Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2014-11-13

Re: [PATCH 1/4] pwm: Imagination Technologies PWM DAC driver

From: Andrew Bresticker <hidden>
Date: 2014-11-13 05:43:49
Also in: linux-pwm

On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 4:37 AM,  [off-list ref] wrote:
From: Naidu Tellapati <redacted>

The Pistachio SOC from Imagination Technologies includes a Pulse Width
Modulation DAC which produces 1 to 4 digital bit-outputs which represent
digital waveforms. These PWM outputs are primarily in charge of controlling
backlight LED devices.

Signed-off-by: Naidu Tellapati <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Sai Masarapu <redacted>
quoted hunk
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/Kconfig b/drivers/pwm/Kconfig
index ef2dd2e..de1c922 100644
quoted hunk
@@ -110,6 +110,16 @@ config PWM_FSL_FTM
          To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the module
          will be called pwm-fsl-ftm.

+config PWM_IMG
+       tristate "Imagination Technologies PWM driver"
+       depends on MFD_SYSCON
It also at least depends on HAS_IOMEM.  Is this IP present on non-MIPS
SoCs?  If not, then maybe add depends on MIPS || COMPILE_TEST.
quoted hunk
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-img.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-img.c
new file mode 100755
index 0000000..9361dbf
quoted hunk
@@ -0,0 +1,294 @@
+/*
+ * Imagination Technologies Pulse Width Modulator driver
+ *
+ * Copyright (c) 2014, Imagination Technologies
+ *
+ * Based on drivers/pwm/pwm-tegra.c, Copyright (c) 2010, NVIDIA Corporation
+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+ * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
+ * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
+ * (at your option) any later version.
+ *
+ * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT
+ * ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or
+ * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the GNU General Public License for
+ * more details.
I don't think this paragraph is necessary.
+ *
+ */
+
+#include <linux/clk.h>
+#include <linux/err.h>
+#include <linux/io.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/of.h>
+#include <linux/platform_device.h>
+#include <linux/pwm.h>
+#include <linux/regmap.h>
+#include <linux/slab.h>
+#include <linux/mfd/syscon.h>
+
+/* PWM registers */
+#define CR_PWM_CTRL_CFG                        0x0000 /* Control and config register */
+#define PWM_CH_DIV_MASK(ch)            (BIT(ch * 2 + 4) | BIT(ch * 2 + 5))
This is a strange way to define a mask.  Like I mentioned in the
watchdog driver, I prefer to use unshifted masks - not sure if Thierry
has a preference though.

Also, be sure to parenthesize macro parameters when they are used in
the expression.
+#define PWM_CH_DIV_SHIFT(ch)           (ch * 2 + 4)
+
+#define CR_PWM_CH_CFG(ch)              (0x4 + (ch) * 4) /* Config register */
+#define TMBASE_SHIFT                   0
+#define DUTY_SHIFT                     16
Maybe prefix these tow CR_PWM_CH_CFG to make it clear as to which
register these fields belong?  Same goes for the other field #defines
below.
+#define CR_PERIP_PWM_PDM_CONTROL       0x0140 /* PWM and PDM ctrl register */
+#define PWM_PDM_CH_CTRL_SHIFT(ch)      (ch * 4)
+
+#define NUM_PWM                                4
+#define SUB_DIV0                       1
+#define SUB_DIV1                       2
+#define NO_SUB_DIV                     0
+#define SUB_DIV0_DIV1                  3
+#define MIN_TMBASE_STEPS               1
+#define MAX_TMBASE_STEPS               65536
+#define MIN_DUTY_STEPS                 0
+#define MAX_DUTY_STEPS                 65535
Please place these #defines next to their corresponding register or
register field #define.
+struct img_pwm_chip {
+       struct device   *dev;
+       struct clk      *clk;
+       struct pwm_chip chip;
+       void __iomem    *base;
+       struct regmap *periph_regs;
+};
+
+static inline struct img_pwm_chip *to_img_pwm_chip(struct pwm_chip *chip)
+{
+       return container_of(chip, struct img_pwm_chip, chip);
+}
+
+static inline void img_pwm_writel(struct img_pwm_chip *chip,
+                               unsigned int reg, unsigned long val)
+{
+       writel(val, chip->base + reg);
+}
+
+static inline unsigned int img_pwm_readl(struct img_pwm_chip *chip,
+                                       unsigned int reg)
+{
+       return readl(chip->base + reg);
+}
+
+static int img_pwm_get_div_and_tmbase(struct pwm_chip *chip,
+               unsigned long in_freq, unsigned long out_freq,
+               unsigned int *divider, unsigned int *tmbase)
+{
+       unsigned long mul;
+
+       mul = DIV_ROUND_UP(in_freq, out_freq);
+       if (mul > MAX_TMBASE_STEPS * 512)
+               return -EINVAL;
+
+       if (mul <= MAX_TMBASE_STEPS) {
+               *divider = 1;
+               *tmbase = mul;
+       } else if (mul <= MAX_TMBASE_STEPS * 8) {
+               *divider = 8;
+               *tmbase = mul / 8;
+               *tmbase += mul % 8;
+       } else if (mul <= MAX_TMBASE_STEPS * 64) {
+               *divider = 64;
+               *tmbase = mul / 64;
+               *tmbase += mul % 64;
+       } else if (mul <= MAX_TMBASE_STEPS * 512) {
+               *divider = 512;
+               *tmbase = mul / 512;
+               *tmbase += mul % 512;
+       }
+
+       return 0;
+}
+
+static void img_pwm_ch_config(struct img_pwm_chip *chip,
+               unsigned int ch_num, unsigned int divider,
+               unsigned int tmbase_steps, unsigned int duty_steps)
+{
+       unsigned int div;
+       unsigned long val;
+
+       switch (divider) {
+       case 1:
+               div = NO_SUB_DIV;
+               break;
+       case 8:
+               div = SUB_DIV0;
+               break;
+       case 64:
+               div = SUB_DIV1;
+               break;
+       case 512:
+               div = SUB_DIV0_DIV1;
+               break;
+       }
+
+       val = img_pwm_readl(chip, CR_PWM_CTRL_CFG);
+       val &= ~PWM_CH_DIV_MASK(ch_num);
+       val |= (div << PWM_CH_DIV_SHIFT(ch_num)) & PWM_CH_DIV_MASK(ch_num);
+       img_pwm_writel(chip, CR_PWM_CTRL_CFG, val);
+
+       duty_steps = duty_steps << DUTY_SHIFT;
+       tmbase_steps = tmbase_steps << TMBASE_SHIFT;
+       val = (duty_steps | tmbase_steps);
Why not do:

val = (duty_steps << DUTY_SHIFT) | (tmbase_steps << TMBASE_SHIFT):

I don't see any need for the intermediate assignments.
+       img_pwm_writel(chip, CR_PWM_CH_CFG(ch_num), val);
+}
+
+static int img_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
+                       int duty_ns, int period_ns)
+{
+       unsigned int divider;
+       unsigned int duty_steps;
+       unsigned int tmbase_steps;
+       unsigned long output_clk_hz;
+       unsigned long input_clk_hz;
+       struct img_pwm_chip *pwm_chip;
+
+       pwm_chip = to_img_pwm_chip(chip);
+
+       input_clk_hz = clk_get_rate(pwm_chip->clk);
+       output_clk_hz = DIV_ROUND_UP(NSEC_PER_SEC, period_ns);
+       if (img_pwm_get_div_and_tmbase(chip, input_clk_hz,
+                               output_clk_hz, &divider, &tmbase_steps) < 0) {
+               dev_err(chip->dev,
+                       "failed to configure timebase steps/divider value.\n");
+               return -EINVAL;
+       }
+
+       duty_steps = (tmbase_steps * duty_ns) / (period_ns);
Unnecessary parenthesis.
+       img_pwm_ch_config(pwm_chip, pwm->hwpwm, divider,
+                       tmbase_steps, duty_steps);
+
+       return 0;
+}
+
+static int img_pwm_enable(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm)
+{
+       unsigned int val = 0;
No need to initialize val (there are other places where this is done as well).
+       struct img_pwm_chip *pwm_chip;
+
+       pwm_chip = to_img_pwm_chip(chip);
+
+       val = img_pwm_readl(pwm_chip, CR_PWM_CTRL_CFG);
+       val |= BIT(pwm->hwpwm);
+       img_pwm_writel(pwm_chip, CR_PWM_CTRL_CFG, val);
+       regmap_read(pwm_chip->periph_regs, CR_PERIP_PWM_PDM_CONTROL, &val);
+       val &= ~BIT(PWM_PDM_CH_CTRL_SHIFT(pwm->hwpwm));
+       regmap_write(pwm_chip->periph_regs, CR_PERIP_PWM_PDM_CONTROL, val);
+
+       return 0;
+}
+
+static void img_pwm_disable(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm)
+{
+       unsigned int val = 0;
+       struct img_pwm_chip *pwm_chip;
+
+       pwm_chip = to_img_pwm_chip(chip);
+
+       val = img_pwm_readl(pwm_chip, CR_PWM_CTRL_CFG);
+       val &= ~BIT(pwm->hwpwm);
+       img_pwm_writel(pwm_chip, CR_PWM_CTRL_CFG, val);
+       regmap_read(pwm_chip->periph_regs, CR_PERIP_PWM_PDM_CONTROL, &val);
+       val |= BIT(PWM_PDM_CH_CTRL_SHIFT(pwm->hwpwm));
+       regmap_write(pwm_chip->periph_regs, CR_PERIP_PWM_PDM_CONTROL, val);
FYI there's regmap_update_bits() which will do the read-modify-write sequence.
+}
+
+static const struct pwm_ops img_pwm_ops = {
+       .config = img_pwm_config,
+       .enable = img_pwm_enable,
+       .disable = img_pwm_disable,
+       .owner = THIS_MODULE,
+};
+
+static int img_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+       int ret;
+       struct resource *res;
+       struct img_pwm_chip *pwm;
+
+       pwm = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*pwm), GFP_KERNEL);
+       if (!pwm)
+               return -ENOMEM;
+
+       pwm->dev = &pdev->dev;
+
+       res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
+       pwm->base = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res);
+       if (IS_ERR(pwm->base))
+               return PTR_ERR(pwm->base);
+
+       pwm->periph_regs = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle(pdev->dev.of_node,
+                                                       "img,cr-periph");
+       if (IS_ERR(pwm->periph_regs))
+               return PTR_ERR(pwm->periph_regs);
+
+       pwm->clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "pwm");
+       if (IS_ERR(pwm->clk)) {
+               dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get the clock.\n");
+               return PTR_ERR(pwm->clk);
+       }
+
+       ret = clk_prepare_enable(pwm->clk);
+       if (ret < 0) {
+               dev_err(&pdev->dev, "could not prepare or enable pwm clock.\n");
+               return ret;
+       }
+
+       pwm->chip.dev = &pdev->dev;
+       pwm->chip.ops = &img_pwm_ops;
+       pwm->chip.base = -1;
+       pwm->chip.npwm = NUM_PWM;
+
+       ret = pwmchip_add(&pwm->chip);
+       if (ret < 0) {
+               dev_err(&pdev->dev, "pwmchip_add failed: %d\n", ret);
+               clk_disable_unprepare(pwm->clk);
+               return ret;
+       }
+
+       platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pwm);
+
+       return 0;
+}
+
+static int img_pwm_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+       int i;
+       unsigned int val = 0;
+       struct img_pwm_chip *pwm_chip = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
+
+       for (i = 0; i < NUM_PWM; i++) {
+               val = img_pwm_readl(pwm_chip, CR_PWM_CTRL_CFG);
+               val &= ~BIT(i);
+               img_pwm_writel(pwm_chip, CR_PWM_CTRL_CFG, val);
+       }
+
+       clk_disable_unprepare(pwm_chip->clk);
+
+       return pwmchip_remove(&pwm_chip->chip);
+}
+
+static const struct of_device_id img_pwm_of_match[] = {
+       { .compatible = "img,pistachio-pwm", },
+       { }
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, img_pwm_of_match);
+
+static struct platform_driver img_pwm_driver = {
+       .driver = {
+               .name = "img-pwm",
+               .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(img_pwm_of_match),
+       },
+       .probe = img_pwm_probe,
+       .remove = img_pwm_remove,
+};
+module_platform_driver(img_pwm_driver);
+
+MODULE_AUTHOR("Sai Masarapu [off-list ref]");
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Imagination Technologies PWM DAC driver");
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
--
1.7.0.4
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help