Thread (23 messages) 23 messages, 4 authors, 2014-12-03

Re: [PATCH RFC v2 08/12] soc: samsung: pm_domain: Add support for parent power domain

From: amit daniel kachhap <hidden>
Date: 2014-11-25 08:58:03
Also in: linux-arm-kernel, linux-pm, linux-samsung-soc, lkml

On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 1:29 PM, Ulf Hansson [off-list ref] wrote:
On 24 November 2014 at 14:04, Amit Daniel Kachhap
[off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
This patch adds supports for parent power domain. This will ensure
invoking of parent/child power domain on/off in a correct sequence.
In exynos7 SOC's, power domain controllers have parent and child
hierarchy.

Cc: Kukjin Kim <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <redacted>
---
 .../bindings/arm/exynos/power_domain.txt           |    2 +
 drivers/soc/samsung/pm_domains.c                   |   43 +++++++++++++++++++-
 2 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/exynos/power_domain.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/exynos/power_domain.txt
index 00ebda1..0160bdc 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/exynos/power_domain.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/exynos/power_domain.txt
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ Optional Properties:
        - pclkN, clkN: Pairs of parent of input clock and input clock to the
                devices in this power domain. Maximum of 4 pairs (N = 0 to 3)
                are supported currently.
+- parents: phandle of parent power domains.

 Node of a device using power domains must have a samsung,power-domain property
 defined with a phandle to respective power domain.
@@ -48,6 +49,7 @@ Example:
        mfc_pd: power-domain@10044060 {
                compatible = "samsung,exynos4210-pd", "samsung,exynos7-pd-mfc";
                reg = <0x10044060 0x20>;
+               parents = <&pd_top>;
                #power-domain-cells = <0>;
        };
This seems like a good and generic approach to describe that a PM
domain could have a parent. I would suggest to rename it, such it
reflects its a PM domain binding though.
I am not sure if this is generic. I guess PD's represented like below
are more generic.
PD1 {
        PD2 {
                PD3 {
                };
        };
};
So, maybe we can add this as a common DT binding for the generic PM
domain instead of having it as Exynos specific?
Yes sure.

Regards,
Amit D
Kind regards
Uffe

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help