On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 01:46:31AM +0000, Grant Likely wrote:

On Tue, 28 Oct 2014 22:36:02 +0200
, Pantelis Antoniou [off-list ref]
 wrote:

quoted

Dynamically inserting i2c client device nodes requires the use
of a single device registration method. Rework and export it.

Signed-off-by: Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou-OWPKS81ov/FWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>

Acked-by: Grant Likely <redacted>

Wolfram, this patch and the next one only make sense in conjunction with the overlay
patches, but they don't necessarily need to be merged via the same tree.
I'm happy to take them, but am equally happy to have you take them
(assuming I ack the next patch; I haven't looked at it yet). What is
your preference?

OK, now I had the time to look at it, phew.

Is this targetted for 3.19? Then you can take it:
Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa-z923LK4zBo2bacvFa/9K2g@public.gmane.org>

There is a minor conflict caused by this patch in i2c/for-next which
should be easy to solve, just remove the irq handling.

2fd36c552649 2014-10-30 15:59 Laurent Pinchart   o i2c: core: Map OF IRQ at probe time

If you target for later than 3.19, then we need to discuss again,
because there might be other i2c core changes coming in.