On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 09:38:39AM +0200, Christophe Ricard wrote:
I would just add an additional comment to my previous message.
After reviewing Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt, it looks like it
is *not* necessary to send this patch marked as stable because of the
following rule:
"- It must fix a real bug that bothers people (not a, "This could be a
problem..." type thing)."
As argued previously this patch is more an algorithm fix luckily never
seen with the current ST33 I2C TPM devices.
I looks like a "This could be a problem..."
Do you agree with this ?
Yes, please clarify your patch description with something like:
'This never happens in practice because the burst count is XXX bytes
and the largest TPM command is YYY bytes.'
Jason
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html