On Tue, 26 Aug 2014 11:42:57 +0900
Simon Horman [off-list ref] wrote:

On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 02:02:00AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:

quoted

Hi Simon,

On Tuesday 26 August 2014 08:57:20 Simon Horman wrote:

quoted

On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 02:59:46PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven
wrote:

quoted

On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 2:35 PM, Mikhail Ulyanov wrote:

quoted

+  - compatible: should containg one of the following:
+                       - "renesas,jpu-r8a7790" for R-Car H2
+                       - "renesas,jpu-r8a7791" for R-Car M2
+                       - "renesas,jpu-gen2" for R-Car second
generation

Isn't "renesas,jpu-gen2" meant as a fallback?

I.e. the DTS should have one of '7790 and '7791, AND the gen2
fallback, so we can make the driver match against '7790 and
'7791 is we find out about an incompatibility.

Is there a document that clearly states that there is such a thing
as jpu-gen2 in hardware? If not I would prefer not to add a
binding for it.

How about going the other way around and requesting that document ?

Good idea, I will make a request.

Hi Simon,

Is there any update on this topic from HW team? 
If no, should i left it as is?