Mon, 22 Sep 2014 13:39:26 +0200 от Geert Uytterhoeven [off-list ref]:

On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 9:40 AM, Alexander Shiyan [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-74xx-mmio.txt

@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
+* 74XX MMIO GPIO driver
+
+Required properties:
+- compatible: Should contain one of the following:
+   "ti,74ahc1g125": for 74AHC1G125 (1-bit Input),
+   "ti,74auc1g174": for 74AUC1G74 (1-bit Output),
+   "ti,74lvc2g125": for 74LVC2G125 (2-bit Input),
+   "ti,74hc74":     for 74HC74 (2-bit Output),
+   "ti,74hc125":    for 74HC125 (4-bit Input),
+   "ti,74hc175":    for 74HC175 (4-bit Output),
+   "ti,74hc365":    for 74HC365 (6-bit Input),
+   "ti,74hc174":    for 74HC174 (6-bit Output),
+   "ti,74hc244":    for 74HC244 (8-bit Input),
+   "ti,74hc273":    for 74HC273 (8-bit Output),
+   "ti,74ac1624":   for 74AC1624 (16-bit Input),
+   "ti,74ac16374":  for 74AC16374 (16-bit Output).

As the actual implementation technology doesn't matter, I think you
should use the base name where appropriate.
E.g. "ti,7474" instead of "ti,74hc74".

Make sense.

Linus, what you think overall about this driver?

---