Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] power: gpio-charger: add device tree support
From: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Date: 2014-09-23 16:08:53
Also in:
linux-pm, lkml
Heiko, On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 4:59 AM, Heiko Stuebner [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
From: Heiko Stuebner <redacted> Add the ability to parse gpio-charger data from a devicetree node. Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <redacted> --- drivers/power/gpio-charger.c | 72 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 70 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/power/gpio-charger.c b/drivers/power/gpio-charger.c index a0024b2..22f084a 100644 --- a/drivers/power/gpio-charger.c +++ b/drivers/power/gpio-charger.c@@ -22,6 +22,8 @@ #include <linux/platform_device.h> #include <linux/power_supply.h> #include <linux/slab.h> +#include <linux/of.h> +#include <linux/of_gpio.h> #include <linux/power/gpio-charger.h>@@ -69,6 +71,59 @@ static enum power_supply_property gpio_charger_properties[] = { POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_ONLINE, }; +static +struct gpio_charger_platform_data *gpio_charger_parse_dt(struct device *dev) +{ + struct device_node *np = dev->of_node; + struct gpio_charger_platform_data *pdata; + const char *chargetype; + enum of_gpio_flags flags; + int ret; + + if (!np) + return ERR_PTR(-ENOENT); + + pdata = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*pdata), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!pdata) + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); + + pdata->name = np->name; + + pdata->gpio = of_get_gpio_flags(np, 0, &flags); + if (pdata->gpio < 0) { + if (pdata->gpio != -EPROBE_DEFER) + dev_err(dev, "could not get charger gpio\n"); + return ERR_PTR(pdata->gpio); + } + + pdata->gpio_active_low = !!(flags & OF_GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW); + + pdata->type = POWER_SUPPLY_TYPE_UNKNOWN; + ret = of_property_read_string(np, "charger-type", &chargetype); + if (ret >= 0) { + if (!strncmp("unknown", chargetype, 7)) + pdata->type = POWER_SUPPLY_TYPE_UNKNOWN; + else if (!strncmp("battery", chargetype, 7)) + pdata->type = POWER_SUPPLY_TYPE_BATTERY; + else if (!strncmp("ups", chargetype, 3)) + pdata->type = POWER_SUPPLY_TYPE_UPS; + else if (!strncmp("mains", chargetype, 5)) + pdata->type = POWER_SUPPLY_TYPE_MAINS; + else if (!strncmp("usb-sdp", chargetype, 7)) + pdata->type = POWER_SUPPLY_TYPE_USB; + else if (!strncmp("usb-dcp", chargetype, 7)) + pdata->type = POWER_SUPPLY_TYPE_USB_DCP; + else if (!strncmp("usb-cdp", chargetype, 7)) + pdata->type = POWER_SUPPLY_TYPE_USB_CDP; + else if (!strncmp("usb-aca", chargetype, 7)) + pdata->type = POWER_SUPPLY_TYPE_USB_ACA; + else + dev_warn(dev, "unknown charger type %s\n", chargetype); + } + + return pdata; +} + static int gpio_charger_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) { const struct gpio_charger_platform_data *pdata = pdev->dev.platform_data;@@ -78,8 +133,13 @@ static int gpio_charger_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) int irq; if (!pdata) { - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "No platform data\n"); - return -EINVAL; + pdata = gpio_charger_parse_dt(&pdev->dev); + if (IS_ERR(pdata)) { + ret = PTR_ERR(pdata); + if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER) + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "No platform data\n"); + return ret; + } } if (!gpio_is_valid(pdata->gpio)) {@@ -103,6 +163,7 @@ static int gpio_charger_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) charger->get_property = gpio_charger_get_property; charger->supplied_to = pdata->supplied_to; charger->num_supplicants = pdata->num_supplicants; + charger->of_node = pdev->dev.of_node; ret = gpio_request(pdata->gpio, dev_name(&pdev->dev)); if (ret) {@@ -189,6 +250,12 @@ static int gpio_charger_resume(struct device *dev) static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(gpio_charger_pm_ops, gpio_charger_suspend, gpio_charger_resume); +static const struct of_device_id gpio_charger_match[] = { + { .compatible = "gpio-charger" }, + { } +}; +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, gpio_charger_match); + static struct platform_driver gpio_charger_driver = { .probe = gpio_charger_probe, .remove = gpio_charger_remove,@@ -196,6 +263,7 @@ static struct platform_driver gpio_charger_driver = { .name = "gpio-charger", .owner = THIS_MODULE, .pm = &gpio_charger_pm_ops, + .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(gpio_charger_match),
I'm still not convinced about of_match_ptr() here as you can see in my response to v2. ...but at most it could give a warning that would be something like "gpio_charger_match defined but not used" in the !CONFIG_OF case, so I guess it's fine? In any case, everything else looks reasonable: Reviewed-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> Tested-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>