Thread (11 messages) 11 messages, 4 authors, 2014-08-29

Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] pinctrl: qcom: Add APQ8084 pinctrl support

From: Bjorn Andersson <hidden>
Date: 2014-08-29 06:01:06
Also in: linux-arm-kernel, linux-arm-msm, lkml

On Tue 26 Aug 05:45 PDT 2014, Georgi Djakov wrote:

Hi Georgi,

Sorry for missing this before, but I did a quick walkthrough and unfortunately
the gpio configuration needs a few updates.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-apq8084.c b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-apq8084.c
[...]
+
+#define PINGROUP(id, f1, f2, f3, f4, f5, f6, f7)        \
+       {                                               \
+               .name = "gpio" #id,                     \
+               .pins = gpio##id##_pins,                \
+               .npins = ARRAY_SIZE(gpio##id##_pins),   \
+               .funcs = (int[]){                       \
+                       APQ_MUX_gpio,                   \
+                       APQ_MUX_##f1,                   \
+                       APQ_MUX_##f2,                   \
+                       APQ_MUX_##f3,                   \
+                       APQ_MUX_##f4,                   \
+                       APQ_MUX_##f5,                   \
+                       APQ_MUX_##f6,                   \
+                       APQ_MUX_##f7                    \
+               },                                      \
+               .nfuncs = 8,                            \
+               .ctl_reg = 0x1000 + 0x10 * id,          \
+               .io_reg = 0x1004 + 0x10 * id,           \
+               .intr_cfg_reg = 0x1008 + 0x10 * id,     \
+               .intr_status_reg = 0x100c + 0x10 * id,  \
+               .intr_target_reg = 0x400 + 0x4 * id,    \
The routing of the interrupt is specified in TLMM_GPIO_INTR_CFG(n),
i.e: 0x1008 + 0x10 * n

Apparently the HW guys wanted to give us more work, so in 8084 they use 3 to
specify routing the interrupts to KPSS, instead of the previous 4. So the
static define of INTR_TARGET_PROC_APPS is no longer adequate.

My suggestion is that you create an additional patch and add to your series
that moves todays hardcoded 4 into the soc_data for the existing platforms (or
include it in this struct).
+               .mux_bit = 2,                           \
+               .pull_bit = 0,                          \
+               .drv_bit = 6,                           \
+               .oe_bit = 9,                            \
+               .in_bit = 0,                            \
+               .out_bit = 1,                           \
+               .intr_enable_bit = 0,                   \
+               .intr_status_bit = 0,                   \
+               .intr_ack_high = 1,                     \
With the 8084 TLMM chip you ack the interrupt status by clearing this bit, so
intr_ack_high should be 0.
+               .intr_target_bit = 0,                   \
Target bit is 5.
+               .intr_raw_status_bit = 3,               \
Raw interrupt status bit is 4.
+               .intr_polarity_bit = 1,                 \
+               .intr_detection_bit = 2,                \
+               .intr_detection_width = 1,              \
You can do level, raise, fall and both edge detection with 8084, so the width
of his part is 2.
+       }
+
Regards,
Bjorn
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help