On Thu, 2014-08-21 at 02:28PM +0200, Michal Simek wrote:

On 08/20/2014 10:41 PM, Soren Brinkmann wrote:

quoted

Match the naming pattern of all other SMP ops and rename
zynq_platform_cpu_die --> zynq_cpu_die.

Signed-off-by: Soren Brinkmann <redacted>
---
 arch/arm/mach-zynq/platsmp.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-zynq/platsmp.c b/arch/arm/mach-zynq/platsmp.c
index 04e578718aa2..95933c5e70e1 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-zynq/platsmp.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-zynq/platsmp.c

@@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ static int zynq_cpu_kill(unsigned cpu)
  *
  * Called with IRQs disabled
  */
-static void zynq_platform_cpu_die(unsigned int cpu)
+static void zynq_cpu_die(unsigned int cpu)
 {
 	zynq_slcr_cpu_state_write(cpu, true);
 

@@ -158,7 +158,7 @@ struct smp_operations zynq_smp_ops __initdata = {
 	.smp_boot_secondary	= zynq_boot_secondary,
 	.smp_secondary_init	= zynq_secondary_init,
 #ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
-	.cpu_die		= zynq_platform_cpu_die,
+	.cpu_die		= zynq_cpu_die,
 	.cpu_kill		= zynq_cpu_kill,
 #endif
 };

Will be good if you can move fix that kernel-doc format for this function
too. It is just nice to have thing.

All these SMP-ops should be documented in the header defining that
struct, shouldn't they?

	Sören