Thread (43 messages) 43 messages, 7 authors, 2014-09-02

Re: [PATCH v8 03/11] ARM: brcmstb: add debug UART for earlyprintk support

From: Brian Norris <hidden>
Date: 2014-08-13 22:11:52
Also in: linux-arm-kernel, lkml

Ping (Olof or Matt?)

On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 9:56 AM, Brian Norris
[off-list ref] wrote:
On Sat, Aug 02, 2014 at 09:30:40AM +0100, Russell King wrote:
quoted
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 02:07:58PM -0700, Brian Norris wrote:
quoted
From: Marc Carino <redacted>

Add the UART definitions needed to support earlyprintk on brcmstb machines.

Signed-off-by: Marc Carino <redacted>
Acked-by: Florian Fainelli <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <redacted>
I noticed that you sent this to the patch system.  I asked Olof last
night whether he had anything in arm-soc touching Kconfig.debug, and
he does (a number of other platforms have updated it.)  This means
that if I apply it to my tree, it may conflict, so I'm reluctant to
take it.
OK... Matt told me that such patches go through you. So which is it?
Should all Kconfig.debug patches go through the arm-soc route?
How should this get in? Should I rebase/resend through Matt and
arm-soc? Or can you pick this up as-is?

Brian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help