Thread (21 messages) 21 messages, 5 authors, 2014-07-09

Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] PCI: designware: refactor MSI code to work with v3.65 dw hardware

From: Jingoo Han <hidden>
Date: 2014-07-08 12:20:36
Also in: linux-pci, lkml

On Tuesday, July 08, 2014 1:53 AM, Murali Karicheri wrote:
On 07/07/2014 12:17 AM, Mohit KUMAR DCG wrote:
quoted
On Tuesday, July 01, 2014 3:15 AM, Murali Karicheri wrote:
quoted
Keystone PCI controller is based on v3.65 version of the DW PCI h/w that
implements MSI controller registers in application space compared to the
newer version. This requires updates to the DW core API to support the PCI
controller driver based on this old DW hardware. Add msi_irq_set()/clear()
API functions to allow Set/Clear MSI IRQ enable bit in the application register.
Also the old h/w uses MSI_IRQ register in application register space to raise
MSI IRQ to the RC from EP. Current code uses the standard mechanism as
per PCI spec. So add another API get_msi_data() to get the address of this
register so that common code can be re-used on old h/w.

Signed-off-by: Murali Karicheri<redacted>

CC: Santosh Shilimkar<redacted>
CC: Russell King<redacted>
CC: Grant Likely<redacted>
CC: Rob Herring<robh+dt@kernel.org>
CC: Mohit Kumar<redacted>
CC: Jingoo Han<redacted>
CC: Bjorn Helgaas<bhelgaas@google.com>
CC: Pratyush Anand<redacted>
CC: Richard Zhu<redacted>
CC: Kishon Vijay Abraham I<redacted>
CC: Marek Vasut<marex@denx.de>
CC: Arnd Bergmann<arnd@arndb.de>
CC: Pawel Moll<redacted>
CC: Mark Rutland<mark.rutland@arm.com>
CC: Ian Campbell<redacted>
CC: Kumar Gala<redacted>
CC: Randy Dunlap<redacted>
CC: Grant Likely<redacted>
---
  drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c |   50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
---------
  drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.h |    3 +++
  2 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-
designware.c
index d8f3af7..905941c 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c
@@ -217,27 +217,47 @@ static int find_valid_pos0(struct pcie_port *pp, int
msgvec, int pos, int *pos0)
  	return 0;
  }

+static void dw_pcie_msi_clear_irq(struct pcie_port *pp, int irq) {
+	unsigned int res, bit, val;
+
+	res = (irq / 32) * 12;
+	bit = irq % 32;
+	dw_pcie_rd_own_conf(pp, PCIE_MSI_INTR0_ENABLE + res, 4,&val);
+	val&= ~(1<<  bit);
+	dw_pcie_wr_own_conf(pp, PCIE_MSI_INTR0_ENABLE + res, 4, val); }
+
  static void clear_irq_range(struct pcie_port *pp, unsigned int irq_base,
  			    unsigned int nvec, unsigned int pos)  {
-	unsigned int i, res, bit, val;
+	unsigned int i;

  	for (i = 0; i<  nvec; i++) {
  		irq_set_msi_desc_off(irq_base, i, NULL);
  		clear_bit(pos + i, pp->msi_irq_in_use);
  		/* Disable corresponding interrupt on MSI controller */
-		res = ((pos + i) / 32) * 12;
-		bit = (pos + i) % 32;
-		dw_pcie_rd_own_conf(pp, PCIE_MSI_INTR0_ENABLE + res,
4,&val);
-		val&= ~(1<<  bit);
-		dw_pcie_wr_own_conf(pp, PCIE_MSI_INTR0_ENABLE + res,
4, val);
+		if (pp->ops->msi_clear_irq)
+			pp->ops->msi_clear_irq(pp, pos + i);
+		else
+			dw_pcie_msi_clear_irq(pp, pos + i);
  	}
  }

+static void dw_pcie_msi_set_irq(struct pcie_port *pp, int irq) {
+	unsigned int res, bit, val;
+
+	res = (irq / 32) * 12;
+	bit = irq % 32;
+	dw_pcie_rd_own_conf(pp, PCIE_MSI_INTR0_ENABLE + res, 4,&val);
+	val |= 1<<  bit;
+	dw_pcie_wr_own_conf(pp, PCIE_MSI_INTR0_ENABLE + res, 4, val); }
+
  static int assign_irq(int no_irqs, struct msi_desc *desc, int *pos)  {
-	int res, bit, irq, pos0, pos1, i;
-	u32 val;
+	int irq, pos0, pos1, i;
  	struct pcie_port *pp = sys_to_pcie(desc->dev->bus->sysdata);

  	if (!pp) {
@@ -281,11 +301,10 @@ static int assign_irq(int no_irqs, struct msi_desc
*desc, int *pos)
  		}
  		set_bit(pos0 + i, pp->msi_irq_in_use);
  		/*Enable corresponding interrupt in MSI interrupt controller
*/
-		res = ((pos0 + i) / 32) * 12;
-		bit = (pos0 + i) % 32;
-		dw_pcie_rd_own_conf(pp, PCIE_MSI_INTR0_ENABLE + res,
4,&val);
-		val |= 1<<  bit;
-		dw_pcie_wr_own_conf(pp, PCIE_MSI_INTR0_ENABLE + res,
4, val);
+		if (pp->ops->msi_set_irq)
+			pp->ops->msi_set_irq(pp, pos0 + i);
+		else
+			dw_pcie_msi_set_irq(pp, pos0 + i);
  	}

  	*pos = pos0;
@@ -353,7 +372,10 @@ static int dw_msi_setup_irq(struct msi_chip *chip,
struct pci_dev *pdev,
  	 */
  	desc->msi_attrib.multiple = msgvec;

-	msg.address_lo = virt_to_phys((void *)pp->msi_data);
+	if (pp->ops->get_msi_data)
+		msg.address_lo = pp->ops->get_msi_data(pp);
+	else
+		msg.address_lo = virt_to_phys((void *)pp->msi_data);
  	msg.address_hi = 0x0;
  	msg.data = pos;
  	write_msi_msg(irq,&msg);
diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.h b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-
designware.h
index 8121901..387f69e 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.h
+++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.h
@@ -67,6 +67,9 @@ struct pcie_host_ops {
  			unsigned int devfn, int where, int size, u32 val);
  	int (*link_up)(struct pcie_port *pp);
  	void (*host_init)(struct pcie_port *pp);
+	void (*msi_set_irq)(struct pcie_port *pp, int irq);
+	void (*msi_clear_irq)(struct pcie_port *pp, int irq);
+	u32 (*get_msi_data)(struct pcie_port *pp);
  };

  int dw_pcie_cfg_read(void __iomem *addr, int where, int size, u32 *val);
- Now MSI specific dw code can be shared b/w old Synopsys controller (ver<  3.70)
and newer controller that standardize the MSI settings inside design ware core itself.

Jingoo,

Pls let us know if you have any concern or comment over this.

Acked-by: Mohit Kumar<redacted>

Regards
Mohit
quoted
--
1.7.9.5
Mohit,

Thanks.

Jingoo, could you provide your response or Ack?
Acked-by: Jingoo Han <redacted>

Best regards,
Jingoo Han
Thanks
--
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help