Hello Doug,
Thanks a lot for your feedback.
On 06/25/2014 08:06 PM, Doug Anderson wrote:
Javier,
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 11:20 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas
[off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
@@ -33,6 +38,6 @@ Example: Clock consumer node
foo@0 {
compatible = "bar,foo";
/* ... */
- clock-names = "my-clock";
- clocks = <&max77686 2>;
+ clock-names = "32khz_pmic";
+ clocks = <&max77686 MAX77686_CLK_PMIC>;
A minor comment here is that you probably shouldn't change "clock-names".
The "clock-names" is the consumer's concept of the clock name and not
the producer's concept. If this clock were specified as going into
the TPM, for instance, the TPM might call it "32k-reference". Then
the TPM would get the clock by referring to this name in its driver.
-Doug
You're right. I won't change the clock names in the next version of the patch-set.
Best regards,
Javier