Thread (60 messages) 60 messages, 5 authors, 2014-06-17

Re: [PATCH 15/22] pinctrl: sunxi: Add A23 PIO controller support

From: Maxime Ripard <hidden>
Date: 2014-06-17 14:20:09
Also in: linux-arm-kernel, linux-serial, lkml

Hi,

On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 06:25:14PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
Hi,

On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 3:08 AM, Maxime Ripard
[off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 03:51:18PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
quoted
The A23 uses the same pin controller as previous SoC's from Allwinner.
Add support for the pins controlled by the main PIO controller.

Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <redacted>
---
 .../bindings/pinctrl/allwinner,sunxi-pinctrl.txt   |   2 +
 drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/Kconfig                      |   4 +
 drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/Makefile                     |   1 +
 drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sun8i-a23.c          | 562 +++++++++++++++++++++
 4 files changed, 569 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sun8i-a23.c
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/allwinner,sunxi-pinctrl.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/allwinner,sunxi-pinctrl.txt
index d8d0656..93ce12e 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/allwinner,sunxi-pinctrl.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/allwinner,sunxi-pinctrl.txt
@@ -13,6 +13,8 @@ Required properties:
   "allwinner,sun6i-a31-pinctrl"
   "allwinner,sun6i-a31-r-pinctrl"
   "allwinner,sun7i-a20-pinctrl"
+  "allwinner,sun8i-a23-pinctrl"
+  "allwinner,sun8i-a23-r-pinctrl"
This last line belongs in the R_PIO patch :)
quoted
 - reg: Should contain the register physical address and length for the
   pin controller.
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/Kconfig b/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/Kconfig
index da1e830..17a4281 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/Kconfig
@@ -32,4 +32,8 @@ config PINCTRL_SUN7I_A20
      def_bool PINCTRL_SUNXI || MACH_SUN7I
      select PINCTRL_SUNXI_COMMON

+config PINCTRL_SUN8I_A23
+       def_bool PINCTRL_SUNXI || MACH_SUN8I
+       select PINCTRL_SUNXI_COMMON
Since it's going to be merged in 3.16, you can just depend on MACH_SUN8I.
Just want to make sure before I send v2 of the whole series, this should be

        def_bool MACH_SUN8I
        select PINCTRL_SUNXI_COMMON

correct?

Or should it be

        bool
        depends on MACH_SUN8I
        select PINCTRL_SUNXI_COMMON

and MACH_SUN8I selects PINCTRL_SUN8I_A23

I'm not sure what the transition plan was.
The former.
quoted
quoted
 endif
[...]

v2 will also have EINT support.
Cool :)

Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com

Attachments

Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help