On 01/06/14 14:38, Rickard Strandqvist wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
There is a risk that the variable will be used without being initialized.
This was largely found by using a static code analysis program called cppcheck.
Signed-off-by: Rickard Strandqvist <redacted>
---
drivers/tty/serial/msm_serial.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/msm_serial.c b/drivers/tty/serial/msm_serial.c
index 053b98e..c67f5c5 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/serial/msm_serial.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/serial/msm_serial.c
@@ -962,7 +962,7 @@ static int __init msm_console_setup(struct console *co, char *options)
{
struct uart_port *port;
struct msm_port *msm_port;
- int baud, flow, bits, parity;
+ int baud = 0, flow, bits, parity;
This made me wonder my "baud" is special compared to the other three
variables. In fact I don't really think it is special so setting "baud"
from the else clause in the uninitialized branch makes more sense to me.