Re: [PATCH v4 5/8] clk: exynos: use cpu-clock provider type to represent arm clock.
From: Tomasz Figa <hidden>
Date: 2014-05-16 23:57:35
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-samsung-soc
Hi Thomas, On 14.05.2014 03:11, Thomas Abraham wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
From: Thomas Abraham <redacted> With the addition of the new Samsung specific cpu-clock type, the arm clock can be represented as a cpu-clock type and the independent clock blocks that made up the arm clock can be removed. Cc: Tomasz Figa <redacted> Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham <redacted> --- drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4.c | 25 +++++++++---------------- drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5250.c | 12 ++++++------ include/dt-bindings/clock/exynos5250.h | 1 + 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4.c b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4.c index b4f9672..7e3bb16c 100644 --- a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4.c +++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4.c@@ -471,7 +471,6 @@ static struct samsung_mux_clock exynos4210_mux_clks[] __initdata = { MUX(0, "mout_fimd1", group1_p4210, E4210_SRC_LCD1, 0, 4), MUX(0, "mout_mipi1", group1_p4210, E4210_SRC_LCD1, 12, 4), MUX(CLK_SCLK_MPLL, "sclk_mpll", mout_mpll_p, SRC_CPU, 8, 1), - MUX(CLK_MOUT_CORE, "mout_core", mout_core_p4210, SRC_CPU, 16, 1), MUX(CLK_SCLK_VPLL, "sclk_vpll", sclk_vpll_p4210, SRC_TOP0, 8, 1), MUX(CLK_MOUT_FIMC0, "mout_fimc0", group1_p4210, SRC_CAM, 0, 4), MUX(CLK_MOUT_FIMC1, "mout_fimc1", group1_p4210, SRC_CAM, 4, 4),@@ -530,7 +529,6 @@ static struct samsung_mux_clock exynos4x12_mux_clks[] __initdata = { MUX(0, "mout_jpeg", mout_jpeg_p, E4X12_SRC_CAM1, 8, 1), MUX(CLK_SCLK_MPLL, "sclk_mpll", mout_mpll_p, SRC_DMC, 12, 1), MUX(CLK_SCLK_VPLL, "sclk_vpll", mout_vpll_p, SRC_TOP0, 8, 1), - MUX(CLK_MOUT_CORE, "mout_core", mout_core_p4x12, SRC_CPU, 16, 1), MUX(CLK_MOUT_FIMC0, "mout_fimc0", group1_p4x12, SRC_CAM, 0, 4), MUX(CLK_MOUT_FIMC1, "mout_fimc1", group1_p4x12, SRC_CAM, 4, 4), MUX(CLK_MOUT_FIMC2, "mout_fimc2", group1_p4x12, SRC_CAM, 8, 4),@@ -572,8 +570,6 @@ static struct samsung_mux_clock exynos4x12_mux_clks[] __initdata = { /* list of divider clocks supported in all exynos4 soc's */ static struct samsung_div_clock exynos4_div_clks[] __initdata = { - DIV(0, "div_core", "mout_core", DIV_CPU0, 0, 3), - DIV(0, "div_core2", "div_core", DIV_CPU0, 28, 3),
Please don't remove these clocks, as they will be necessary to define proper hierarchy CMU_CPU clock output block. In particular, access to following clocks will be required: div_corem0 div_corem1 div_cores div_atb div_periph div_pclk_dbg div_hpm They might be implemented using normal dividers, but with CLK_DIVIDER_READ_ONLY [1] and CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE flags. [1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel/322977/focus=322978 This also means keeping mout_core clock defined, but with CLK_MUX_READ_ONLY flag it should be fine.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
DIV(0, "div_fimc0", "mout_fimc0", DIV_CAM, 0, 4), DIV(0, "div_fimc1", "mout_fimc1", DIV_CAM, 4, 4), DIV(0, "div_fimc2", "mout_fimc2", DIV_CAM, 8, 4),@@ -619,8 +615,8 @@ static struct samsung_div_clock exynos4_div_clks[] __initdata = { DIV(0, "div_spi_pre2", "div_spi2", DIV_PERIL2, 8, 8), DIV(0, "div_audio1", "mout_audio1", DIV_PERIL4, 0, 4), DIV(0, "div_audio2", "mout_audio2", DIV_PERIL4, 16, 4), - DIV(CLK_ARM_CLK, "arm_clk", "div_core2", DIV_CPU0, 28, 3), - DIV(CLK_SCLK_APLL, "sclk_apll", "mout_apll", DIV_CPU0, 24, 3), + DIV_F(CLK_SCLK_APLL, "sclk_apll", "mout_apll", DIV_CPU0, 24, 3, + CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE, 0),
Do you need CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE here? AFAIK whenever rate is changed on APLL the clock core will recalculate rate of this clock.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
DIV_F(0, "div_mipi_pre0", "div_mipi0", DIV_LCD0, 20, 4, CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT, 0), DIV_F(0, "div_mmc_pre0", "div_mmc0", DIV_FSYS1, 8, 8,@@ -1003,12 +999,6 @@ static struct samsung_gate_clock exynos4x12_gate_clks[] __initdata = { 0), }; -static struct samsung_clock_alias exynos4_aliases[] __initdata = { - ALIAS(CLK_MOUT_CORE, NULL, "moutcore"), - ALIAS(CLK_ARM_CLK, NULL, "armclk"), - ALIAS(CLK_SCLK_APLL, NULL, "mout_apll"), -}; - static struct samsung_clock_alias exynos4210_aliases[] __initdata = { ALIAS(CLK_SCLK_MPLL, NULL, "mout_mpll"), };@@ -1241,6 +1231,9 @@ static void __init exynos4_clk_init(struct device_node *np, ARRAY_SIZE(exynos4210_gate_clks)); samsung_clk_register_alias(exynos4210_aliases, ARRAY_SIZE(exynos4210_aliases)); + exynos_register_arm_clock(CLK_ARM_CLK, mout_core_p4210, + ARRAY_SIZE(mout_core_p4210), reg_base, np, NULL, + &samsung_clk_lock); } else { samsung_clk_register_mux(exynos4x12_mux_clks, ARRAY_SIZE(exynos4x12_mux_clks));@@ -1250,11 +1243,11 @@ static void __init exynos4_clk_init(struct device_node *np, ARRAY_SIZE(exynos4x12_gate_clks)); samsung_clk_register_alias(exynos4x12_aliases, ARRAY_SIZE(exynos4x12_aliases)); + exynos_register_arm_clock(CLK_ARM_CLK, mout_core_p4x12, + ARRAY_SIZE(mout_core_p4x12), reg_base, np, NULL, + &samsung_clk_lock); } - samsung_clk_register_alias(exynos4_aliases, - ARRAY_SIZE(exynos4_aliases)); - exynos4_clk_sleep_init(); pr_info("%s clocks: sclk_apll = %ld, sclk_mpll = %ld\n"@@ -1262,7 +1255,7 @@ static void __init exynos4_clk_init(struct device_node *np, exynos4_soc == EXYNOS4210 ? "Exynos4210" : "Exynos4x12", _get_rate("sclk_apll"), _get_rate("sclk_mpll"), _get_rate("sclk_epll"), _get_rate("sclk_vpll"), - _get_rate("arm_clk")); + _get_rate("armclk"));
I'd prefer name of this clock to be not changed to not cause conflicts with other patches. Similar comments apply to clk-exynos5250. Best regards, Tomasz