Re: [PATCH v4 5/9] dt-bindings: pci: rcar pcie device tree bindings
From: <hidden>
Date: 2014-03-24 12:25:49
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-pci, linux-sh
Hi Ben, On: 24/03/2014 12:16, Ben wrote:
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/9] dt-bindings: pci: rcar pcie device tree
bindings
On 24/03/14 12:04, Phil.Edworthy@renesas.com wrote:quoted
Hi Lucas, On: 21/03/2014 15:02, Phil wrote:quoted
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/9] dt-bindings: pci: rcar pcie device treebindingsquoted
Hi Lucas, On: 21/03/2014 14:31, Lucas wrote:quoted
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/9] dt-bindings: pci: rcar pcie device treebindingsquoted
quoted
Am Freitag, den 21.03.2014, 14:18 +0000 schrieb Phil.Edworthy@renesas.com:quoted
Hi Lucas, On 21/03/2014 11:24, Lucas wrote:quoted
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/9] dt-bindings: pci: rcar pcie devicetreequoted
quoted
quoted
bindingsquoted
Am Freitag, den 21.03.2014, 10:32 +0000 schrieb Phil Edworthy:quoted
This patch adds the bindings for the rcar PCIE driver. Thedriverquoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
resides under drivers/pci/host/pcie-rcar.c Signed-off-by: Phil Edworthy <redacted>I have one question below. If you can answer this with yes after thinking again about it, this is: Reviewed-by: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>quoted
--- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/rcar-pci.txt | 40++++++++++++++++++++++quoted
quoted
1 file changed, 40 insertions(+) create mode 100644Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/rcar-pci.txtquoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/rcar-pci.txtb/quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/rcar-pci.txtquoted
new file mode 100644 index 0000000..0e219b0--- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/rcar-pci.txt@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@ +* Renesas RCar PCIe interface + +Required properties: +- compatible: should contain one of the following + "renesas,r8a7779-pcie", "renesas,r8a7790-pcie","renesas,r8a7791-pcie"quoted
quoted
+- reg: base addresses and lengths of the pcie controller. +- #address-cells: set to <3> +- #size-cells: set to <2> +- device_type: set to "pci" +- ranges: ranges for the PCI memory and I/O regions +- interrupts: interrupt values for MSI interrupt +- #interrupt-cells: set to <1> +- interrupt-map-mask and interrupt-map: standard PCI properties + to define the mapping of the PCIe interface to interrupt + numbers. +- clocks: from common clock binding: handle to pci clock. +- clock-names: from common clock binding: should be "pcie"You really only have one PCIe clock? So the controller isgenerating thequoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
PCIe bus clock from it's register clock? No need to enable anyotherquoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
clock for PCIe to work?Yes, just the one clock. The PCIe bus clock is an external clockdedicatedquoted
quoted
quoted
to PCIe and SATA, and we have no control over it.Is this some kind of always-on clock? If not you probably want a reference to it from the PCIe driver even if it's shared between
SATA
quoted
quoted
quoted
and PCIe. After all you don't want to end up unconditionally
enabling
quoted
quoted
quoted
this clock from the board or SoC level just to have PCIe working,right?quoted
Ok, I see, I'll need a reference to a board clock, even if it's
always
quoted
on forquoted
these boards.One small question... The patches added the PCIe host controller to two devices, r8a7790 and r8a7791. The r8a7790-based Lager board doesn't have the necessary
hardware
quoted
to use PCIe, so should I add a dummy pcie_bus clock to the Lager board dts, even though PCIe is not used? I'm just wondering what the dts file looks like for a board that
doesn't
quoted
support many interfaces. Does it become littered with dummy clocks and regulators?The bridge node should be set to disabled by default so it never gets probed. Any boards that want to use it can over-ride the status to be enabled.
Ok, thanks. Phil