Thread (16 messages) 16 messages, 4 authors, 2014-03-17

Re: [PATCH RFC v4 3/3] Documentation: arm: define DT idle states bindings

From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <hidden>
Date: 2014-03-10 18:01:09
Also in: linux-arm-kernel, linux-pm

On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 04:04:49PM +0000, Sebastian Capella wrote:
Quoting Lorenzo Pieralisi (2014-02-18 03:47:31)
quoted
+       - index
+               Usage: Required
+               Value type: <u32>
+               Definition: It represents the idle state index.
+                           An increasing index value implies less power
+                           consumption. Index must be given a sequential
+                           value = {0, 1, ....}, starting from 0.
One minor comment.  In the example, it can be tricky to see how this is sequential
since the states interleave.  Not sure if it merits rewording here?
- index
	Usage: Required
	Value type: <u32>
	Definition: It represents the idle state index.
		    The index must be given an increasing
		    value = {0, 1, ....}, starting from 0, with higher
		    values implying less power consumption.
		    Indices must be unique as seen from a cpu
		    perspective, ie phandles in the cpu nodes [1]
		    cpu-idle-states array property are not allowed to
		    point at idle state nodes having the same index
		    value.

Ack ?

I will post a v5, should be final.

Lorenzo
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help