Re: [PATCH RFC v4 3/3] Documentation: arm: define DT idle states bindings
From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <hidden>
Date: 2014-03-10 18:01:09
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-pm
From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <hidden>
Date: 2014-03-10 18:01:09
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-pm
On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 04:04:49PM +0000, Sebastian Capella wrote:
Quoting Lorenzo Pieralisi (2014-02-18 03:47:31)quoted
+ - index + Usage: Required + Value type: <u32> + Definition: It represents the idle state index. + An increasing index value implies less power + consumption. Index must be given a sequential + value = {0, 1, ....}, starting from 0.One minor comment. In the example, it can be tricky to see how this is sequential since the states interleave. Not sure if it merits rewording here?
- index
Usage: Required
Value type: <u32>
Definition: It represents the idle state index.
The index must be given an increasing
value = {0, 1, ....}, starting from 0, with higher
values implying less power consumption.
Indices must be unique as seen from a cpu
perspective, ie phandles in the cpu nodes [1]
cpu-idle-states array property are not allowed to
point at idle state nodes having the same index
value.
Ack ?
I will post a v5, should be final.
Lorenzo