Re: devicetree repository separation/migration
From: Warner Losh <hidden>
Date: 2014-02-21 18:28:04
On Feb 20, 2014, at 4:39 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
On Wed, 19 Feb 2014 14:43:58 -0700, Warner Losh [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Feb 19, 2014, at 2:09 PM, Grant Likely wrote:quoted
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 6:18 PM, Jason Cooper [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 04:57:50PM +0100, Sascha Hauer wrote:quoted
It will be interesting to see which rules should apply for merging new bindings. I know that devicetrees should be OS agnostic, but sometimes they are modelled after how Linux currently works. What happens when the *BSD guys have different ideas how a good binding looks like? How will such conflicts be resolved?That's more a question for Grant. I assume we'll all put on our big-boy pants and pick the best technical solution based on their merits. :)I think you've answered it pretty competently.What, the BSDs don't get a free pass to dump junk into the process. I'm shocked :) But we have bug-boy pants over in BSD land, so that shouldn't be a problem.Bug-boy pants? Sounds sticky.
Yea, gotta those accidental typos... Warner -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree-compiler" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html