Re: devicetree repository separation/migration

On Wed, 2014-02-19 at 13:23 -0700, Warner Losh wrote:

On Feb 19, 2014, at 11:32 AM, Jason Cooper wrote:

quoted

On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 11:47:56AM -0800, Olof Johansson wrote:

quoted

On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 10:18 AM, Jason Cooper [off-list ref] wrote:
I think we have two options:

1. Bring out everything in the current kernel repo to a separate one,
but do it my mirroring over. Changes go into the kernel repo first and
then comes over to this one, but other projects can mirror the
standalone repo without downloading a whole kernel tree.

I prefer this one.  Assuming that a separate repo is mostly agreed upon,
this allows us to provide the tree in an easily digestible way without
impacting the current workflow.

Also, if it works for the other projects, no one says we have to move
beyond this step.

I just joined this list...  What's the scope of what would move into the new
repo? The dts files with the binding docs, or also the code to implement
those bindings?

Just the dts(i) and Bindings docs, not the code.

e.g. something like
http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=people/ianc/device-tree-rebasing.git
would be the ultimate goal.

Ian.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html