Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] Phytec phyFLEX-i.MX6 : Added USB_OTG Support
From: Shawn Guo <hidden>
Date: 2014-02-19 06:59:53
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel
Do not send email in html. On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 12:11:41PM +0530, Ashutosh wrote:
By seeing the discussion would the below changes is appropriate
regulators {
compatible = "simple-bus";
#address-cells = <1>;
#size-cells = <0>;
reg_usb_otg_vbus: regulator@0 {
compatible = "regulator-fixed";
reg = <0>;
regulator-name = "usb_otg_vbus";
regulator-min-microvolt = <5000000>;
regulator-max-microvolt = <5000000>;
gpio = <&gpio4 15 0>;
};
But as Mark [1] suggested not to use simple bus. Which one is more appropriate
?Since it's already been used so widely and provided us a nice way to use the generic node name, I believe Mark is giving up his position. Shawn
[1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-usb/msg101477.html
-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html