Re: [PATCH v5 01/11] of: document bindings for reserved-memory nodes
From: Tomasz Figa <hidden>
Date: 2014-02-28 10:02:49
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, lkml
On 28.02.2014 10:54, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
Hello, On 2014-02-26 12:51, Grant Likely wrote:quoted
On Fri, 21 Feb 2014 13:25:17 +0100, Marek Szyprowski [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
From: Grant Likely <redacted> Reserved memory nodes allow for the reservation of static (fixed address) regions, or dynamically allocated regions for a specific purpose. Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <redacted> [joshc: Based on binding document proposed (in non-patch form) here:http://lkml.kernel.org/g/20131030134702.19B57C402A0@trevor.secretlab.caquoted
adapted to support #memory-region-cells] Signed-off-by: Josh Cartwright <redacted> Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> --- .../bindings/reserved-memory/reserved-memory.txt | 138++++++++++++++++++++quoted
1 file changed, 138 insertions(+) create mode 100644Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reserved-memory/reserved-memory.txtquoted
diff --gita/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reserved-memory/reserved-memory.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reserved-memory/reserved-memory.txtquoted
new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..a606ce90c9c4--- /dev/null +++b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/reserved-memory/reserved-memory.txtquoted
@@ -0,0 +1,138 @@ +*** Reserved memory regions *** + +Reserved memory is specified as a node under the /reserved-memorynode.quoted
+The operating system shall exclude reserved memory from normal usage +one can create child nodes describing particular reserved (excludedfromquoted
+normal use) memory regions. Such memory regions are usuallydesigned forquoted
+the special usage by various device drivers. + +Parameters for each memory region can be encoded into the device tree +with the following nodes: + +/reserved-memory node +--------------------- +#address-cells, #size-cells (required) - standard definition + - Should use the same values as the root node +#memory-region-cells (required) - dictates number of cells used inthe childquoted
+ nodes memory-region specifierI still don't like this portion of the binding. I'm not convinced that it is necessary in the majority of cases and it is going to be very driver specific. I would rather drop it entirely from the common binding. If a specific driver needs to do something like the above then it can have a driver specific binding. Otherwise I think the default should be a simple phandle with no arguments to a single reserved memory node. Ben, can you weigh in on the current state of this document. I'm mostly happy with it aside from my comment above. Do you think this is ready to be merged?quoted
+ranges (required) - standard definition + - Should be empty + +/reserved-memory/ child nodes +----------------------------- +Each child of the reserved-memory node specifies one or moreregions ofquoted
+reserved memory. Each child node may either use a 'reg' property to +specify a specific range of reserved memory, or a 'size' property with +optional constraints to request a dynamically allocated block ofmemory.quoted
+ +Following the generic-names recommended practice, node names should +reflect the purpose of the node (ie. "framebuffer" or "dma-pool").Unitquoted
+address (@<address>) should be appended to the name if the node is a +static allocation. + +Properties: +Requires either a) or b) below. +a) static allocation + reg (required) - standard definition +b) dynamic allocation + size (required) - length based on parent's #size-cells + - Size in bytes of memory to reserve. + alignment (optional) - length based on parent's #size-cells + - Address boundary for alignment ofallocation.quoted
+ alloc-ranges (optional) - prop-encoded-array (address, lengthpairs).quoted
+ - Specifies regions of memory that are + acceptable to allocate from. + +If both reg and size are present, then the reg property takesprecedencequoted
+and size is ignored. + +Additional properties: +compatible (optional) - standard definition + - may contain the following strings: + - shared-dma-pool: This indicates a region of memory meantto bequoted
+ used as a shared pool of DMA buffers for a set ofdevices. It canquoted
+ be used by an operating system to instanciate thenecessary poolquoted
+ management subsystem if necessary. + - vendor specific string in the form<vendor>,[<device>-]<usage> Add "Use vendor strings to identify regions dedicates for a specific vendor device. For example: 'acme,framebuffer'. Platform code can use vendor strings to identify device specific regions"So do you want to completely drop phandle based links between device nodes and memory regions?
Huh? How this would work with regions that have to be used for multiple (but not all - not a default region) devices? Best regards, Tomasz