On 2/6/2014 9:11 PM, Joe Perches wrote:

On Thu, 2014-02-06 at 20:15 -0800, Frank Rowand wrote:

quoted

On 1/15/2014 10:47 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:

quoted

The first breaks a reset-controller include ordering requirement. It got
an ack so I think we're ok for it to go through the clock tree.

< snip >

checkpatch is whining about patches

  4
  5
  6
  7
  8

(Just for completeness if someone thinks I did not check all the patches,
it also whines about patch 11, but I think the whining should be ignored,
and it whines about patch 1 but I think that might be a checkpatch bug.)

Hi Frank.

For patch 1, what checkpatch bug might that be?

see below

I think all the checkpatch whinges in patch 11 are correct.

Agreed on patch 11, judgement call on whether to ignore the warnings.

I didn't check any of 4-8.

Hi Joe,

Thanks for jumping in.  I did not want to bother you until I dug a little
deeper into the warning to see if I was just misunderstanding something.

Sorry, it is patch 2, not patch 1 ("[PATCH v5 02/14] clk: Add set_rate_and_parent() op"):

   WARNING: Multiple spaces after return type
   #188: FILE: include/linux/clk-provider.h:154:
   +       int             (*set_rate_and_parent)(struct clk_hw *hw,

   total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 152 lines checked

-Frank