On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 05:31:08PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 11:20:51AM -0600, Josh Cartwright wrote:
quoted
On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 05:18:34PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
quoted
On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 10:51:27AM -0600, Josh Cartwright wrote:
quoted
config SPI_QUP
tristate "Qualcomm SPI Support with QUP interface"
depends on OF
depends on ARM
quoted
quoted
Does this really depend on ARM? If so why?
quoted
The ARM dependency is there for the use of _relaxed io accessor
variants.
That's not ARM only and I thought we were getting generic versions of it
anyway? ARMv8, MIPS, Microblaze, Hexagon and SH also define it.
Okay, that's fair. I'm only vaguely familiar with the generic _relaxed
variants, but until they land, how do we appropriately declare the
dependency to prevent breaking COMPILE_TEST builds on architectures that
don't have them? Or should we either bother?
Do we need to introduce a HAVE_RELAXED_IO_ACCESSORS selected by those
architectures with support?
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html