Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2014-01-21

Re: [PATCH v2 14/15] watchdog: orion: Allow to build on any Orion platform

From: Andrew Lunn <hidden>
Date: 2014-01-21 09:45:01
Also in: linux-arm-kernel, linux-watchdog

On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 10:41:17AM +0100, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
On 01/21/14 10:12, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
quoted
After getting rid of all the mach-specific code, it's now possible
to allow builds in any Orion platform.

Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
---
 drivers/watchdog/Kconfig | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/Kconfig b/drivers/watchdog/Kconfig
index 5be6e91..1689f72 100644
--- a/drivers/watchdog/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/watchdog/Kconfig
@@ -282,7 +282,7 @@ config DAVINCI_WATCHDOG

 config ORION_WATCHDOG
 	tristate "Orion watchdog"
-	depends on ARCH_ORION5X || ARCH_KIRKWOOD || ARCH_DOVE
+	depends on PLAT_ORION
Ezequiel,

while above is true now, I tend to rather have ARCH_MVEBU added here.
We really want to get rid of both !ARCH_MVEBU and PLAT_ORION and this
unnecessarily will make it more complicated.

I haven't checked why ARCH_MVEBU at all added PLAT_ORION as dependency,
but IIRC it was just because of a missing mbus driver? If it is just
this, we should also remove PLAT_ORION from ARCH_MVEBU to have a clean
cut between new common arch and existing sub-archs.
I took a look at this when moving DT kirkwood into mach-mvebu. There
is nothing in plat-orion which ARCH_MVEBU needs. So i agree with
Sebastian, it should be PLAT_ORION || ARCH_MVEBU.

	   Andrew
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help