Re: [PATCH v5 4/8] ARM: do CPU-specific init for Broadcom Brahma15 cores
From: Mark Rutland <hidden>
Date: 2014-01-24 10:55:25
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, lkml
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 03:30:48AM +0000, Marc Carino wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Perform any CPU-specific initialization required on the Broadcom Brahma-15 core. Signed-off-by: Marc Carino <redacted> Acked-by: Florian Fainelli <redacted> --- arch/arm/mm/proc-v7.S | 11 +++++++++++ 1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/proc-v7.S b/arch/arm/mm/proc-v7.S index bd17819..98ea423 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mm/proc-v7.S +++ b/arch/arm/mm/proc-v7.S@@ -193,6 +193,7 @@ __v7_cr7mp_setup: b 1f __v7_ca7mp_setup: __v7_ca15mp_setup: +__v7_b15mp_setup: mov r10, #0 1: #ifdef CONFIG_SMP@@ -494,6 +495,16 @@ __v7_ca15mp_proc_info: .size __v7_ca15mp_proc_info, . - __v7_ca15mp_proc_info /* + * Broadcom Corporation Brahma-B15 processor. + */ + .type __v7_b15mp_proc_info, #object +__v7_b15mp_proc_info: + .long 0x420f00f0 + .long 0xff0ffff0 + __v7_proc __v7_b15mp_setup, hwcaps = HWCAP_IDIV
On the third posting, Will Deacon asked if the hwcap override was really required [1]. Two postings later there's been no answer. Is your CPUID_EXT_ISAR0 value wrong? If so, please add a comment to that effect (as with __krait_proc_info). Thanks, Mark. [1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-January/225895.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html