Re: [PATCH RFC 01/10] ARM: s3c64xx: pm: Use name field of generic_pm_domain

[PATCH RFC 00/10] Generic Device Tree based power domain look-up · Tomasz Figa <hidden> · 2014-01-11
[PATCH RFC 07/10] ARM: s3c64xx: dt: Enable SoC-level power management · Tomasz Figa <hidden> · 2014-01-11
[PATCH RFC 08/10] ARM: dts: s3c64xx: Add nodes for power domains · Tomasz Figa <hidden> · 2014-01-11
[PATCH RFC 10/10] ARM: dts: s3c6410-mini6410: Add support for LCD screen · Tomasz Figa <hidden> · 2014-01-11
[PATCH RFC 09/10] ARM: dts: s3c64xx: Add node for display controller · Tomasz Figa <hidden> · 2014-01-11
[PATCH RFC 06/10] ARM: s3c64xx: pm: Add device tree based power domain instantiation · Tomasz Figa <hidden> · 2014-01-11
Re: [PATCH RFC 06/10] ARM: s3c64xx: pm: Add device tree based power domain instantiation · Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> · 2014-01-12
Re: [PATCH RFC 06/10] ARM: s3c64xx: pm: Add device tree based power domain instantiation · Tomasz Figa <hidden> · 2014-01-12
Re: [PATCH RFC 06/10] ARM: s3c64xx: pm: Add device tree based power domain instantiation · Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> · 2014-01-13
Re: [PATCH RFC 06/10] ARM: s3c64xx: pm: Add device tree based power domain instantiation · Tomasz Figa <hidden> · 2014-01-13
Re: [PATCH RFC 06/10] ARM: s3c64xx: pm: Add device tree based power domain instantiation · Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> · 2014-01-13
[PATCH RFC 05/10] ARM: exynos: Move to generic power domain bindings · Tomasz Figa <hidden> · 2014-01-11
[PATCH RFC 02/10] ARM: s3c64xx: pm: Add always_on field to s3c64xx_pm_domain struct · Tomasz Figa <hidden> · 2014-01-11
[PATCH RFC 03/10] ARM: s3c64xx: pm: Add pwr_stat bit for domain G · Tomasz Figa <hidden> · 2014-01-11
[PATCH RFC 04/10] base: power: Add generic OF-based power domain look-up · Tomasz Figa <hidden> · 2014-01-11
Re: [PATCH RFC 04/10] base: power: Add generic OF-based power domain look-up · Lorenzo Pieralisi <hidden> · 2014-01-16
Re: [PATCH RFC 04/10] base: power: Add generic OF-based power domain look-up · Tomasz Figa <hidden> · 2014-01-20
Re: [PATCH RFC 04/10] base: power: Add generic OF-based power domain look-up · Lorenzo Pieralisi <hidden> · 2014-01-22
Re: [PATCH RFC 04/10] base: power: Add generic OF-based power domain look-up · Stephen Boyd <hidden> · 2014-01-23
Re: [PATCH RFC 04/10] base: power: Add generic OF-based power domain look-up · Tomasz Figa <hidden> · 2014-01-23
Re: [PATCH RFC 04/10] base: power: Add generic OF-based power domain look-up · Ulf Hansson <hidden> · 2014-02-24
Re: [PATCH RFC 04/10] base: power: Add generic OF-based power domain look-up · Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de> · 2014-02-19
Re: [PATCH RFC 04/10] base: power: Add generic OF-based power domain look-up · Tomasz Figa <hidden> · 2014-02-23
Re: [PATCH RFC 04/10] base: power: Add generic OF-based power domain look-up · Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de> · 2014-02-24
[PATCH RFC 01/10] ARM: s3c64xx: pm: Use name field of generic_pm_domain · Tomasz Figa <hidden> · 2014-01-11
Re: [PATCH RFC 01/10] ARM: s3c64xx: pm: Use name field of generic_pm_domain · Pavel Machek <hidden> · 2014-01-12
Re: [PATCH RFC 01/10] ARM: s3c64xx: pm: Use name field of generic_pm_domain · Tomasz Figa <hidden> · 2014-01-12
Re: [PATCH RFC 01/10] ARM: s3c64xx: pm: Use name field of generic_pm_domain · Pavel Machek <hidden> · 2014-01-12
Re: [PATCH RFC 01/10] ARM: s3c64xx: pm: Use name field of generic_pm_domain · Tomasz Figa <hidden> · 2014-01-12
Re: [PATCH RFC 01/10] ARM: s3c64xx: pm: Use name field of generic_pm_domain · Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> · 2014-01-12
Re: [PATCH RFC 01/10] ARM: s3c64xx: pm: Use name field of generic_pm_domain · Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> · 2014-01-12
Re: [PATCH RFC 01/10] ARM: s3c64xx: pm: Use name field of generic_pm_domain · Tomasz Figa <hidden> · 2014-01-12
Re: [PATCH RFC 00/10] Generic Device Tree based power domain look-up · Tomasz Figa <hidden> · 2014-01-11

From: Pavel Machek <hidden>
Date: 2014-01-12 18:53:42
Also in: linux-arm-kernel, linux-pm, linux-samsung-soc, lkml

Hi!

quoted

Could we get some more descriptive names for the domains?

They are listed like this in user's manual, e.g. DOMAIN_F, DOMAIN_I,
DOMAIN_G, etc.

I guessed so. So the manual sucks. Would it be feasible to get it more
descriptive (like "Domain_G (GPU)")?

									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help