Thread (16 messages) 16 messages, 5 authors, 2013-12-09

Re: [PATCH 1/3] usb: phy-generic: Add GPIO based ChipSelect

flat view

From: Chris Ruehl <hidden>
Date: 2013-12-09 04:10:38
Also in: lkml

On Monday, December 09, 2013 12:07 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
Hi,

On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 09:45:30AM +0800, Chris Ruehl wrote:
quoted
On Saturday, December 07, 2013 04:24 AM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
quoted
Hi,

On Mon, Dec 02, 2013 at 03:05:17PM +0800, Chris Ruehl wrote:
quoted
@@ -231,27 +249,40 @@ static int usb_phy_gen_xceiv_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
  		return -ENOMEM;

  	nop->reset_active_low = true;	/* default behaviour */
+	nop->cs_active_low = true;

  	if (dev->of_node) {
  		struct device_node *node = dev->of_node;
  		enum of_gpio_flags flags;
+		enum of_gpio_flags csflags;

  		if (of_property_read_u32(node, "clock-frequency",&clk_rate))
  			clk_rate = 0;

  		needs_vcc = of_property_read_bool(node, "vcc-supply");
+
  		nop->gpio_reset = of_get_named_gpio_flags(node, "reset-gpios",
  								0,&flags);
+
two unrelated changes
quoted
  		if (nop->gpio_reset == -EPROBE_DEFER)
  			return -EPROBE_DEFER;

  		nop->reset_active_low = flags&  OF_GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW;

+		nop->gpio_chipselect = of_get_named_gpio_flags(node, "cs-gpios",
+								0,&csflags);
+		if (gpio_is_valid(nop->gpio_chipselect))
+			nop->cs_active_low = csflags&  OF_GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW;
+
  	} else if (pdata) {
  		type = pdata->type;
  		clk_rate = pdata->clk_rate;
  		needs_vcc = pdata->needs_vcc;
  		nop->gpio_reset = pdata->gpio_reset;
+		nop->gpio_chipselect = pdata->gpio_chipselect;
+	} else {
+		nop->gpio_reset = -1;
This line is already going upstream, please remove it, i'll handle the
conflict later.
Beause the rest of the patch set is not ready to make it in the
upstream, I will checkout latest linux-next and send the patch again
as a single patch.
no, please *never* base any patches off of linux-next. That tree gets
recreated every day and can never be considered stable. Aim at using a
tag from Linus instead (v3.13-rc3, for example). It's a much better
development point than linux-next.

In case patch doesn't apply cleanly, different maintainers will have
their choice of rebasing it themselves or asking author to rebase on a
specific branch.

By default, however, use a tag from Linus.

cheers
Thanks for the advice, I will follow :-)

Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help