Re: [PATCH 0/2] move of_find_next_cache_node to DT core

On 18/09/13 15:51, Grant Likely wrote:

On Wed, 18 Sep 2013 11:53:03 +0100, Sudeep KarkadaNagesha [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

From: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <redacted>

Hi,

The cache bindings are generic and used by many other architectures
apart from PPC. These patches fixes and move the existing definition
of of_find_next_cache_node to DT common code.

Regards,
Sudeep

Acked-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely-s3s/WqlpOiPyB63q8FvJNQ@public.gmane.org>

However, do you have a user for this function on other architectures
yet? I'd like to see a user for the function in the same patch series..

Yes I have posted an RFC[1] following this series implementing cacheinfo
for ARM similar to x86 implementation. I was not sure if it's good idea
to combine it as its still initial RFC version.

Regards,
Sudeep

[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/9/18/340

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html