Re: [PROPOSAL] ARM/FDT: passing multiple binaries to a kernel

On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 5:13 AM, Grant Likely [off-list ref] wrote:

On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 5:41 PM, Rob Herring [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

quoted

For u-boot Andre has proposed some syntactic sugar over the "fdt"
command to make boot.scr more trivial to use. We would of course need to
implement support for using it in the relevant distro tools (but they
tend to be very distro/machine specific already, e.g. Debian's
flash-kernel)

And being machine specific is a PITA. flash-kernel is certainly not
something we want to expand on. There is not much love for boot.scr
either. There is work to address what are not really machine
differences, but largely vendor u-boot differences:

http://www.mail-archive.com/u-boot-0aAXYlwwYIKGBzrmiIFOJg@public.gmane.org/msg119025.html

One option for u-boot which already supports syslinux style menu files
is to adopt the syslinux multiboot parsing support:

http://www.syslinux.org/wiki/index.php/Doc/mboot

Even building it into U-Boot is problematic because it leaves older
machines out in the cold. Leif's port of Grub to U-Boot is far more
interesting since the distro can now be in control of the code that
loads the images and jumps into the kernel/hypervisor.

Considering there is no distro support for grub on ARM yet, it may be
more interesting in the long run, but it is not for the short term. So
there needs to be something that is supportable on both u-boot and
grub (or any other bootloader).

quoted

We need to back-up and consider what this looks like in the end for
all the pieces and get input from folks on grub, UEFI, and armv8. The
UEFI answer may be this is a grub problem. For armv8, this proposal
does match up well as the kernel boot interface for v8 is DT. Despite
some claims, ACPI will not completely replace DT because of this.

Yes, for UEFI it is absolutely an OS loader problem. UEFI provides an
API and runtime environment. Grub is in general moving towards a boot
menu system and a tool for loading images. Actual booting however
should be done by a separate OS loader application. For Linux, this
will be an in-kernel UEFI Stub. For Xen I would recommend taking the
Linux EFI stub code and doing the same thing. There really isn't a
need for a multiboot spec when you can rely on a runtime execution
environment for setting things up exactly as you want them.

You've lost me as well. How do you see the flow working with UEFI for
a user running bare metal OS, installing Xen, and rebooting running
Xen.

Rob
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html