On Sun, Sep 22, 2013 at 04:14:43PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 8:24 AM, Thierry Reding
[off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Instead of returning 0 for all errors, allow the precise error code to
be propagated. This will be used in subsequent patches to allow further
propagation of error codes.
The interrupt number corresponding to the new mapping is returned in an
output parameter so that the return value is reserved to signal success
(== 0) or failure (< 0).
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <redacted>
One comment below, otherwise:
Acked-by: Rob Herring <redacted>
quoted
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c
index 905a24b..ae71b14 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c
@@ -230,6 +230,7 @@ static int pci_read_irq_line(struct pci_dev *pci_dev)
{
struct of_irq oirq;
unsigned int virq;
+ int ret;
pr_debug("PCI: Try to map irq for %s...\n", pci_name(pci_dev));
@@ -266,8 +267,10 @@ static int pci_read_irq_line(struct pci_dev *pci_dev)
oirq.size, oirq.specifier[0], oirq.specifier[1],
of_node_full_name(oirq.controller));
- virq = irq_create_of_mapping(oirq.controller, oirq.specifier,
- oirq.size);
+ ret = irq_create_of_mapping(oirq.controller, oirq.specifier,
+ oirq.size, &virq);
+ if (ret)
+ virq = NO_IRQ;
}
if(virq == NO_IRQ) {
pr_debug(" Failed to map !\n");
Can you get rid of NO_IRQ usage here instead of adding to it.
I was trying to stay consistent with the remainder of the code. PowerPC
is a pretty heavy user of NO_IRQ. Of all 348 references, more than half
(182) are in arch/powerpc, so I'd rather like to get a go-ahead from
Benjamin on this.
That said, perhaps we should just go all the way and get rid of NO_IRQ
for good. Things could get somewhat messy, though. There are a couple of
these spread through the code:
#ifndef NO_IRQ
#define NO_IRQ (-1)
#endif
And this isn't very encouraging either:
$ git grep 'irq.*=.*-1' | wc -l
638
Thierry