On 20/08/13 15:01, Nishanth Menon wrote:

On 08/20/2013 05:00 AM, Sudeep KarkadaNagesha wrote:

[...]

quoted

Until we get more feedback and agreement on new proposal can we have
this simple amendment in this patch to the existing binding ? Since the
new proposal[1] is backward compatible(this patch adding support for
option#5 to existing option#1), we will have to add support for other
binding options in [1] later.

This is needed to support shared OPPs with simple/single OPP profile
and also to fix the broken and unused binding
@Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/arm_big_little_dt.txt

Regards,
Sudeep

[1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/cpufreq/msg06563.html

Could you post a non-RFC version of this series? As I had mentioned
earlier in the thread, I dont mind having this pulled in as stage 1 of
the transition to a more elaborate solution.

Thanks Nishanth. I would wait till Mark and Stephen agree for this approach.

Regards,
Sudeep