Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] Common Clock Framework support for Samsung S3C64xx
From: Kukjin Kim <hidden>
Date: 2013-08-25 17:19:42
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-samsung-soc
From: Kukjin Kim <hidden>
Date: 2013-08-25 17:19:42
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-samsung-soc
On 08/20/13 16:09, Kukjin Kim wrote:
Mike Turquette wrote:quoted
[...]quoted
quoted
OK, if new branch is ready, I will replace with that or if re-merge is required, I will. Either way, I'm fine and can handle. Mike, let me know your choice :-)Since I have already published it let's just go with the delta patch. I can create another stable branch named clk-next-s3c64xx-delta that just has this patch on top of clk-next-s3c64xx OR I can apply it on top of the existing clk-next-s3c64xx and re-merge it.Sounds good to me. If the branch for the delta is ready, let me know.
Mike, I'm waiting for your delta branch which includes following from Tomasz. [PATCH] clk: samsung: pll: Use new registration method for PLL6552 and PLL6553 I couldn't send some branches to arm-soc for upcoming merge window yet because of build compilation breakage of common-clk-s3c64xx branch which has many dependencies... - Kukjin
quoted
I'm trying to think on whether there are any weird git corner cases with re-merging clk-next-s3c64xx. Let me know if re-merging is somehow unsafe (makes history weird, or whatever).I don't think it causes some problem.quoted
Let me know what option is better for you. I'll publish as soon as I get the delta patch. Apologies again for creating some extra work!No problem.