Thread (7 messages) flat view 7 messages, 3 authors, 2013-08-07

Re: [PATCH 2/2] pinctrl: add generic pins and functions properties

From: Stephen Warren <hidden>
Date: 2013-08-06 17:01:24
Also in: lkml

On 08/06/2013 02:41 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 10:56:00PM +0100, Stephen Warren wrote:
quoted
From: Stephen Warren <redacted>

pinctrl bindings can benefit from generic property names that define
which pins a "pin configuration node" affects, and which mux function
to select onto those pins. Document new properties for this purpose so
that other bindings may refer to them.

Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <redacted>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-bindings.txt | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-bindings.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-bindings.txt
index 31b0cb9..237823a 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-bindings.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-bindings.txt
@@ -138,6 +138,9 @@ structure of the DT nodes that contain these properties.
 
 Supported generic properties are:
 
+pins			- the list of pins that properties in the node
+			  apply to
+function		- the mux function to select
I assume the type of these properties must be described in the more
specific binding?
Yes, I think so. I guess I should also add entries into the section
right below this list which describes the values for each of the
properties that has values.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help