Re: [PATCH 2/2] pinctrl: add generic pins and functions properties
From: Stephen Warren <hidden>
Date: 2013-08-06 17:01:24
Also in:
lkml
On 08/06/2013 02:41 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 10:56:00PM +0100, Stephen Warren wrote:quoted
From: Stephen Warren <redacted> pinctrl bindings can benefit from generic property names that define which pins a "pin configuration node" affects, and which mux function to select onto those pins. Document new properties for this purpose so that other bindings may refer to them. Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <redacted> --- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-bindings.txt | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-bindings.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-bindings.txt index 31b0cb9..237823a 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-bindings.txt +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/pinctrl-bindings.txt@@ -138,6 +138,9 @@ structure of the DT nodes that contain these properties. Supported generic properties are: +pins - the list of pins that properties in the node + apply to +function - the mux function to selectI assume the type of these properties must be described in the more specific binding?
Yes, I think so. I guess I should also add entries into the section right below this list which describes the values for each of the properties that has values.